Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyden, P.
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyden, P.
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, R. L.

(Stroke. 2000;31:169.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Effect of Ganaxolone in a Rodent Model of Cerebral Hematoma

Patrick Lyden, MD; Caroline Shin, MA; Catherine Jackson-Friedman, BS; Steven Hassid, BS Anthony Chong, MD

From the Department of Neurosciences, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, and Department of Neurology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego, Calif.

Correspondence to Dr Patrick Lyden (127), 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA 92161.

Background and Purpose—Therapy with {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonists appears to improve outcome after experimental hematoma but with unacceptable side effects. We looked to synthetic GABA agonists, or positive GABA modulators, widely developed as anticonvulsants and anxiolytics, to find compounds that may be effective. Ganaxolone is a synthetic neuroactive steroid that positively modulates GABA. We sought to determine whether ganaxolone was beneficial using a model of intracerebral hematoma.

Methods—We stereotaxically injected varying doses of bacterial collagenase into the caudate nucleus of rats to induce blood-brain barrier failure and hematoma formation. Four hours later, we administered intravenously 15 or 30 mg/kg ganaxolone (n=23 each group), 20 mg/kg pregnanolone (n=21), or vehicle (n=30). Forty-eight hours after collagenase injection, we rated each animal using a standard rodent neurological examination. The ratings were compared with the amounts of injected collagenase using the quantal bioassay procedure. Other sets of animals were tested later for visuospatial learning. Brains were then prepared for histomorphometry, and brain volumes were estimated.

Results—We found that ganaxolone 30 mg/kg significantly increased the ED50 in the bioassay, for a potency ratio of 1.8±0.41 compared with vehicle (P<0.05). Ganaxolone 15 mg/kg and pregnanolone did not affect neurological outcome. Ganaxolone 30 mg/kg did not clearly improve visuospatial learning several weeks after hemorrhage. Ganaxolone exhibited a weak effect on cerebral volumes 48 hours after stroke, but 3 months after hemorrhage no such effect could be detected.

Conclusions—Ganaxolone improves neurological outcome 48 hours after intracerebral hematoma but not visuospatial learning several weeks after intracerebral hematoma. Histological evidence of damage was reduced at 48 hours but not at 3 months.

Editorial Comment

R. Loch Macdonald, MD, PhD, Guest Editor

Section of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois {hd1}References