(Stroke. 2000;31:662.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Objective Measurement of Functional Upper-Extremity Movement Using Accelerometer Recordings Transformed With a Threshold Filter
From the Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller University of Jena (Germany) (W.H.R.M.).
Background and Purpose—The consensus is that the most important outcome for rehabilitation is functional activity in the life situation. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy, a new treatment that transfers in-clinic gains to the life situation, demands objective measurement of real-world movement. However, direct, objective, and accurate measures of arm use in the real world are not available. Previous attempts to use accelerometry to measure extremity movement have failed because of unacceptable variability. This problem has been addressed here by use of a threshold filter.
Methods—Nine stroke patients and 1 healthy individual wearing accelerometers were videotaped while they carried out their usual activities at home or in the clinic; the duration of their arm, torso, and ambulatory movements was judged by 2 observation teams. In addition, 11 college students performed 5 standardized activities of daily living for varying durations in the laboratory. The accelerometer data were transformed; the raw value recorded for a given epoch was set to a constant if it exceeded a low threshold.
Results—The threshold-filtered recordings measured the duration of movement accurately and with very little variability. Correlations between the threshold-filtered recordings and the observer ratings of the duration of arm, torso, and ambulatory movements were 0.93, 0.93 and 0.99, respectively; the corresponding correlations for the raw values were -0.17, 0.34, and 0.85.
Conclusions—These results present initial evidence for the validity of threshold-filtered accelerometer recordings for objectively measuring the amount of real-world upper-extremity movement as an index of treatment outcome for rehabilitation patients.
Key Words: arm • monitoring, ambulatory • rehabilitation • treatment outcome
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. K. Rinehart, R. D. Singleton, J. C. Adair, J. R. Sadek, and K. Y. Haaland Arm Use After Left or Right Hemiparesis Is Influenced by Hand Preference Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): 545 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, K. Light, and P. A. Thompson The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1189 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.H. van der Lee, H. Beckerman, D.L. Knol, H.C.W. de Vet, and L.M. Bouter Clinimetric Properties of the Motor Activity Log for the Assessment of Arm Use in Hemiparetic Patients Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1410 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, D. Nichols, and S. Wolf Methods for a Multisite Randomized Trial to Investigate the Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Improving Upper Extremity Function among Adults Recovering from a Cerebrovascular Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2003; 17(3): 137 - 152. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H van der Lee, H. Beckerman, G. J Lankhorst, L. M Bouter, S. Blanton, and S. L Wolf Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Physical Therapy, July 1, 2000; 80(7): 711 - 713. [Full Text]
|
|