(Stroke. 2000;31:920.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (D.W.D., R.J., R.T., E.B.R.), and Schering AG, Berlin, Germany (S.W.).
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Dirk W. Droste, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie der WWU Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str 33, D-48129 Münster, Germany. E-mail droste2{at}uni-muenster.de
Background and PurposeAlthough clinically important, proper assessment of intracranial arterial collateral pathways by transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCD) in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) high-grade stenosis or occlusion is occasionally made difficult by an insufficient temporal bone window, an unfavorable insonation angle, or low flow velocity or volume. In these cases, echocontrast could be helpful to increase the diagnostic confidence or to make the diagnosis at all.
MethodsWe investigated 50 temporal windows of 44 patients with
ipsilateral high-grade (
70%) ICA stenosis or occlusion and
insufficient native transtemporal insonation conditions
before and after the application of the echo enhancer Levovist with an
infusion pump.
ResultsCompared with the precontrast scans, echocontrast allowed for more segments to be evaluated by pulsed Doppler sonography (P<0.0001) and for longer lumen segments to be displayed on color mode (P<0.0001). Also, collateral flow via the anterior and posterior communicating artery could be demonstrated in 25 and 32 scans, respectively, compared with only 1 demonstration of each collateral pathway before the application of contrast medium (both P<0.0001). Similarly, with the help of contrast medium, flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery could be measured in 45 cases compared with only 26 cases before contrast was applied (P<0.0001).
ConclusionsIn patients with poor precontrast visualization of intracranial arteries, echocontrast-enhanced TCCD is very helpful in the assessment of intracranial collateral pathways recruited downstream to ICA stenoses and occlusions.
Key Words: carotid artery diseases contrast media ultrasonography, Doppler, duplex
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. R. Bates, C. J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, W. A. Gray, K. Ouriel, E. D. Peterson, K. Rosenfield, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting) Vascular Medicine, February 1, 2007; 12(1): 35 - 83. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic N, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, E. R. Bates, J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey Jr, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2007; 49(1): 126 - 170. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zunker, H. Wilms, J. Brossmann, D. Georgiadis, S. Weber, and G. Deuschl Echo Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Ultrasound: Frequency of Use, Diagnostic Benefit, and Validity of Results Compared With MRA Stroke, November 1, 2002; 33(11): 2600 - 2603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, D. W. Droste, S. Felszeghy, L. Csiba, V. Popa, K. Hegedus, J. Kollar, L. Modis, and E. B. Ringelstein Detection of Carotid Artery Stenosis by In Vivo Duplex Ultrasound: Correlation With Planimetric Measurements of the Corresponding Postmortem Specimens Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2402 - 2407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Deklunder Role of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with cerebrovascular disease Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2002; 4(suppl_C): C51 - C55. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Boyajian, S. M. Otis, D.W. Droste, R. Jurgens, R. Tietje, E.B. Ringelstein, and S. Weber Continuous Infusion Versus Bolus Injection Of Ultrasound Contrast Agents in Vascular Doppler Flow Imaging Response Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31 (9): 2266 - 2278. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |