Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giri, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giri, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Carotid Artery Disease
*Injuries
*Wounds
Hazardous Substances DB
*OXYGEN
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Brain Circulation and Metabolism

(Stroke. 2000;31:961.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Regional Cerebral Blood Flow After Cortical Impact Injury Complicated by a Secondary Insult in Rats

Bala K. Giri, MD; Indra K. Krishnappa, MD; Robert M. Bryan, Jr, PhD Claudia Robertson, MD

From the Departments of Neurosurgery (B.K.G., I.K.K., C.R.) and Anesthesiology (R.M.B.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

Correspondence to Claudia Robertson, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail claudiar{at}bcm.tmc.edu

Background and Purpose—Traumatic injury makes the brain susceptible to secondary insults. An uncomplicated mild lateral cortical impact injury (3 m/s, 2.5-mm deformation) that causes little or no permanent sequelae results in a large contusion at the impact site when the traumatic injury is complicated by a secondary insult, such as 40 minutes of bilateral carotid occlusion.

Methods—To determine whether the increased sensitivity to secondary insults in this model is caused by a vascular mechanism, cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured with 14C-isopropyliodoamphetamine quantitative autoradiography, and brain tissue PO2 (PbtO2) was measured at the impact site and in the contralateral parietal cortex.

Results—In animals that underwent bilateral carotid occlusion 1 hour after the impact injury, CBF and PbtO2 were lower at the impact site than they were in animals that had either the impact injury or the carotid occlusion alone. In the immediate area of the impact, CBF was 14±6 mL · 100 g-1 · min-1 in the animals with the impact injury followed by carotid occlusion compared with 53±24 mL · 100 g-1 · min-1 in the animals with the impact injury alone and 74±14 mL · 100 g-1 · min-1 in the animals with the carotid occlusion alone (P<0.001). At the time of this very low CBF value in the animals with the carotid occlusion after the impact injury, PbtO2 at the impact site averaged 1.3±1.6 mm Hg and was <3 mm Hg in 5 of the 6 animals. In contrast, PbtO2 in the animals with the impact injury alone averaged 9.3±2.9 mm Hg, and none of the animals had a PbtO2 of <3 mm Hg (P=0.008).

Conclusions—The CBF and PbtO2 findings in this model suggest that the reduced CBF after traumatic injury predisposes the brain to secondary insults and results in ischemia when confronted with a reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure.

Editorial Comment

Joe Watson, MD, Guest Editor

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. K. Wilkerson, L. A. Lesniewski, E. M. Golding, R. M. Bryan Jr., A. Amin, E. Wilson, and M. D. Delp
Simulated microgravity enhances cerebral artery vasoconstriction and vascular resistance through endothelial nitric oxide mechanism
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1652 - H1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Cherian, G. Chacko, C. Goodman, and C. S. Robertson
Neuroprotective Effects of L-Arginine Administration after Cortical Impact Injury in Rats: Dose Response and Time Window
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2003; 304(2): 617 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]