Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2000;31:1032-1037

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Winsor, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Winsor, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Home Care Services
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2000;31:1032.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Home or Hospital for Stroke Rehabilitation? Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

II: Cost Minimization Analysis at 6 Months

Craig Anderson, PhD; Cliona Ni Mhurchu, PhD; Sally Rubenach, MSocSc; Michael Clark, PhD; Carol Spencer, BAppSc (OT) Adrian Winsor, FAFRM

From the Rehabilitation & Ageing Studies Unit (C.A., S.R., M.C.), Department of Medicine, Flinders University of South Australia, Daw Park, South Australia; Clinical Trials Research Unit (C.A., C.N.M.), Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; and Southern Domiciliary Care & Rehabilitation Service (C.S., A.W.), Adelaide, South Australia.

Correspondence to Dr Craig Anderson, Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail c.anderson{at}ctru.auckland.ac.nz

Background and Purpose—The goal of the present study was to examine the resource and economic implications of an early hospital discharge and home-based rehabilitation scheme for patients with acute stroke.

Methods—A cost minimization analysis in conjunction with a randomized controlled trial was carried out at 2 affiliated teaching hospitals in the southern metropolitan region of Adelaide, South Australia, between 1997 and 1998. Eighty-six hospitalized patients with acute stroke who required rehabilitation were randomized to receive both early hospital discharge and home-based rehabilitation, or conventional in-hospital rehabilitation and community care. Direct and indirect costs related to stroke rehabilitation were calculated, including hospital bed days, home-based intervention program, community services, and personal expenses during the 6 months after randomization.

Results—The mean cost per patient was lower for patients randomized to the early hospital discharge and home-based rehabilitation ($8040) compared with those who received conventional care ($10 054). This cost saving was not statistically significant (P=0.14). However, sensitivity analyses indicated that the cost of home-based rehabilitation was consistently lower than that of conventional care except when hospital costs were assumed to be 50% less than those used in the main analysis. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the cost of the home-based program was significantly related to a patient’s level of disability after adjustment for age, comorbidity, and the presence or absence of a caregiver.

Conclusions—The early hospital discharge and home-based rehabilitation scheme was less costly than conventional hospital care for patients with stroke. Limitation of the provision of such services to patients with mild disability is likely to be most cost effective.


Key Words: costs and cost analysis • randomized controlled trials • rehabilitation • stroke management




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
JianJun Yu, YongShan Hu, Y. Wu, WenHua Chen, YuLian Zhu, Xiao Cui, WeiBo Lu, Qi Qi, PeiYu Qu, and XiaoHua Shen
The effects of community-based rehabilitation on stroke patients in China: a single-blind, randomized controlled multicentre trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2009; 23(5): 408 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Luengo-Fernandez, A. M. Gray, and P. M. Rothwell
Costs of Stroke Using Patient-Level Data: A Critical Review of the Literature
Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): e18 - e23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
J. P. Ruger
Ethics in American Health 2: An Ethical Framework for Health System Reform
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2008; 98(10): 1756 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. R. Torp, S. Vinkler, K. D. Pedersen, F. R. Hansen, T. Jorgensen, and J. Olsen
Model of Hospital-Supported Discharge After Stroke
Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1514 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
G. A. Caplan, J. Coconis, N. Board, A. Sayers, and J. Woods
Does home treatment affect delirium? A randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation of elderly and care at home or usual treatment (The REACH-OUT trial)
Age Ageing, January 1, 2006; 35(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. Weinrich, M. Stuart, and T. Hoyer
Rules for Rehabilitation: An Agenda for Research
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2005; 19(2): 72 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. Weinrich, D. C. Good, M. Reding, E. J. Roth, D. X. Cifu, K. H. Silver, R. L. Craik, J. Magaziner, M. Terrin, M. Schwartz, et al.
Timing, Intensity, and Duration of Rehabilitation for Hip Fracture and Stroke: Report of a Workshop at the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2004; 18(1): 12 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Donnelly, M. Power, M. Russell, and K. Fullerton
Randomized Controlled Trial of an Early Discharge Rehabilitation Service: The Belfast Community Stroke Trial
Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 127 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Patel, M. Knapp, I. Perez, A. Evans, and L. Kalra
Alternative Strategies for Stroke Care: Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analyses From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 196 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Langhorne
Editorial Comment--Early Supported Discharge: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?
Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2691 - 2692.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Teng, N. E. Mayo, E. Latimer, J. Hanley, S. Wood-Dauphinee, R. Cote, and S. Scott
Costs and Caregiver Consequences of Early Supported Discharge for Stroke Patients
Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 528 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. L. Hackett, A. C. Vandal, C. S. Anderson, and S. E. Rubenach
Long-Term Outcome in Stroke Patients and Caregivers Following Accelerated Hospital Discharge and Home-Based Rehabilitation
Stroke, February 1, 2002; 33(2): 643 - 645.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. M. Geddes and M A. Chamberlain
Home-based rehabilitation for people with stroke: a comparative study of six community services providing co-ordinated, multidisciplinary treatment
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2001; 15(6): 589 - 599.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
P. Griffiths
Prompt hospital discharge with home care improved physical health and community reintegration and reduced initial length of hospital stay after acute stroke
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2000; 3(4): 126 - 126.
[Full Text]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
P. Griffiths
Early discharge plus home based rehabilitation reduced length of initial hospital stay but did not improve health related quality of life in patients with acute stroke
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2000; 3(4): 127 - 127.
[Full Text]