Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2000;31:2112-2116

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Heiss, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Heiss, W. D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Aphasia
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow PET and SPECT
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke
Right arrow Neuroprotectors

(Stroke. 2000;31:2112.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contribution

Piracetam Improves Activated Blood Flow and Facilitates Rehabilitation of Poststroke Aphasic Patients

J. Kessler, PhD; A. Thiel, MD; H. Karbe, MD W. D. Heiss, MD

From Max-Planck-Institute for Neurological Research (J.K., A.T., W.D.H.) and University Clinic of Neurology (H.K., W.D.H.), Cologne, Germany.

Correspondence to Prof Dr J. Kessler, Max-Planck-Institut für neurologische Forschung, Gleueler Str 50, D-50931 Köln, Germany. E-mail josef.kessler{at}pet.mpin-koeln.mpg.de

Background and Purpose—In a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, it was investigated whether piracetam improves language recovery in poststroke aphasia assessed by neuropsychological tests and activation PET measurement of cerebral blood flow.

Methods—Twenty-four stroke patients with aphasia were randomly allocated to 2 groups: 12 patients received 2400 mg piracetam twice daily, 12 placebo. Before and at the end of the 6-week treatment period in which both groups received intensive speech therapy, the patients were examined neuropsychologically and studied with H215O PET at rest and during activation with a word-repetition task. Blood flow was analyzed in 14 language-activated brain regions defined on reconstructed surface views from MRI coregistered to the PET images.

Results—Before treatment, both groups were comparable with respect to performance in language tasks and to type and severity of aphasia. In the piracetam group, increase of activation effect was significantly higher (P<0.05) in the left transverse temporal gyrus, left triangular part of inferior frontal gyrus, and left posterior superior temporal gyrus after the treatment period compared with the initial measures. The placebo group showed an increase of activation effect only in the left vocalization area. In the test battery, the piracetam group improved in 6 language functions, the placebo group only in 3 subtests.

Conclusions—Piracetam as an adjuvant to speech therapy improves recovery of various language functions, and this effect is accompanied by a significant increase of task-related flow activation in eloquent areas of the left hemisphere.


Key Words: aphasia • piracetam • recovery of function • tomography, emission computed




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
S. S. Bullain, L. S. Chriki, and T. A. Stern
Aphasia: Associated Disturbances in Affect, Behavior, and Cognition in the Setting of Speech and Language Difficulties
Psychosomatics, June 1, 2007; 48(3): 258 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. E. Hillis
The right place at the right time?
Brain, June 1, 2006; 129(6): 1351 - 1356.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. Crinion and C. J. Price
Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke
Brain, December 1, 2005; 128(12): 2858 - 2871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J.-F. Demonet, G. Thierry, and D. Cardebat
Renewal of the Neurophysiology of Language: Functional Neuroimaging
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2005; 85(1): 49 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W.-D. Heiss
Editorial Comment--Key Role of the Superior Temporal Gyrus for Language Performance and Recovery From Aphasia
Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2906 - 2907.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
H Duffau, L Capelle, D Denvil, N Sichez, P Gatignol, M Lopes, M-C Mitchell, J-P Sichez, and R Van Effenterre
Functional recovery after surgical resection of low grade gliomas in eloquent brain: hypothesis of brain compensation
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2003; 74(7): 901 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Paola Canevini, R. Chifari, and A. Piazzini
Improvement of a patient with stuttering on levetiracetam
Neurology, October 22, 2002; 59(8): 1288 - 1288.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Walker-Batson, S. Curtis, R. Natarajan, J. Ford, N. Dronkers, E. Salmeron, J. Lai, D. H. Unwin, and D. M. Feeney
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Use of Amphetamine in the Treatment of Aphasia Editorial Comment
Stroke, September 1, 2001; 32(9): 2093 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]