(Stroke. 2000;31:2168.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contribution |
From the Divisions of Neurosurgery (G.B.A., D.E.S., J.M.F.) and Diagnostic Imaging (R.A., R.F.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Correspondence to J. Max Findlay, MD, Division of Neurosurgery, 2D1.02 WMC, University of Alberta, 8440 112 St, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7.
Background and PurposeComputed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a relatively new and minimally invasive method of imaging intracranial and extracranial blood vessels. The main purpose of this study was to compare CTA to the current gold standard of arterial imaging, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), for the detection and quantification of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis. We also compared Doppler ultrasound (US) with these 2 techniques.
MethodsIn a prospective study, 40 patients (80 carotid arteries) underwent CTA, US, and DSA. Patients chosen for inclusion were symptomatic with TIAs or stroke and had initial US screening that indicated >50% carotid stenosis on the side appropriate for the symptoms. Source axial, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and shaded-surface display (SSD) images were produced for each CTA study. The US, CTA, and DSA images were reviewed, with the degree of stenosis quantified and presence of ulcers determined; each type of imaging was reviewed by a separate investigator blinded to the results of the other 2 modalities. The results of CTA and US imaging were compared with the DSA images for degrees of carotid stenosis.
ResultsCTA source axial images correlated with DSA more closely than MIP or SSD images for all degrees of stenosis. The correlation between US and DSA (0.808) was poorer than that between CTA and DSA (0.892 to 0.922). CTA performed well in the detection of mild (0% to 29%) carotid stenosis, as well as carotid occlusion, with values for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy near 100%. In determining that a stenosis was >50% by DSA measurement, CTA was again useful, with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 91%, and 90%, respectively. While CTA was quite specific and accurate in identifying degrees of stenoses in either the 50% to 69% or the 70% to 99% ranges, in this task it was much less sensitive: 65% for 50%69% stenosis and 73% for 70%99% stenosis. These results did not change significantly when only the data from the most clinically relevant symptomatic arteries were analyzed. CTA was found to correlate quite well with DSA in the detection of ulcers associated with the carotid stenosis.
ConclusionsCTA was found to be an excellent examination for the detection of carotid occlusion and categorization of stenosis in either the 0%29% or >50% ranges. However, CTA was unable to reliably distinguish between moderate (50%69%) and severe (70%99%) stenosis, which is an important limitation in the investigation and treatment of carotid stenosis.
Key Words: angiography, computed tomographic carotid endarterectomy carotid stenosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Wintermark, S.S. Jawadi, J.H. Rapp, T. Tihan, E. Tong, D.V. Glidden, S. Abedin, S. Schaeffer, G. Acevedo-Bolton, B. Boudignon, et al. High-Resolution CT Imaging of Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 875 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Dahl, A. Yndestad, M. Skjelland, E. Oie, A. Dahl, A. Michelsen, J. K. Damas, S. H. Tunheim, T. Ueland, C. Smith, et al. Increased Expression of Visfatin in Macrophages of Human Unstable Carotid and Coronary Atherosclerosis: Possible Role in Inflammation and Plaque Destabilization Circulation, February 27, 2007; 115(8): 972 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Matsumoto, N. Kodama, Y. Endo, J. Sakuma, Ky. Suzuki, T. Sasaki, K. Murakami, Ke. Suzuki, T. Katakura, and F. Shishido Dynamic 3D-CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2007; 28(2): 299 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.M. Silvennoinen, S. Ikonen, L. Soinne, M. Railo, and L. Valanne CT Angiographic Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Manual Assessment, Semiautomatic Vessel Analysis, and Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 97 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 632 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.S. Bartlett, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox Correlation of Carotid Stenosis Diameter and Cross-Sectional Areas with CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 638 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Alberts, R. E. Latchaw, W. R. Selman, T. Shephard, M. N. Hadley, L. M. Brass, W. Koroshetz, J. R. Marler, J. Booss, R. D. Zorowitz, et al. Recommendations for Comprehensive Stroke Centers: A Consensus Statement From the Brain Attack Coalition Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1597 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Berg, Z. Zhang, A. Ikonen, P. Sipola, R. Kalviainen, H. Manninen, and R. Vanninen Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography in the Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease in Symptomatic Patients: Comparison with Rotational Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1022 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Matsumoto, N. Kodama, J. Sakuma, S. Sato, M. Oinuma, Y. Konno, K. Suzuki, T. Sasaki, K. Suzuki, T. Katakura, et al. 3D-CT Arteriography and 3D-CT Venography: The Separate Demonstration of Arterial-Phase and Venous-Phase on 3D-CT Angiography in a Single Procedure AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 635 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J.W. Koelemay, P. J. Nederkoorn, J. B. Reitsma, and C. B. Majoie Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2306 - 2312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Wang, D. Saloner, and J. H. Rapp Characteristics of Carotid Plaque as Risk Factors for Stroke Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, September 1, 2004; 16(3): 193 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Feasby and J. M. Findlay CT angiography for the assessment of carotid stenosis Neurology, August 10, 2004; 63(3): 412 - 413. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Josephson, S. O. Bryant, H. K. Mak, S. C. Johnston, W. P. Dillon, and W. S. Smith Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA Neurology, August 10, 2004; 63(3): 457 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos Noninvasive Carotid Imaging Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Olin, J. A. Kaufman, D. A. Bluemke, R. O. Bonow, M. D. Gerhard, M. R. Jaff, G. D. Rubin, and W. Hall Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group IV: Imaging Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2626 - 2633. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kennedy, H. Quan, W. A. Ghali, and T. E. Feasby Importance of the imaging modality in decision making about carotid endarterectomy Neurology, March 23, 2004; 62(6): 901 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nonent, J.-M. Serfaty, N. Nighoghossian, F. Rouhart, L. Derex, C. Rotaru, P. Chirossel, B. Guias, J.-F. Heautot, P. Gouny, et al. Concordance Rate Differences of 3 Noninvasive Imaging Techniques to Measure Carotid Stenosis in Clinical Routine Practice: Results of the CARMEDAS Multicenter Study Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 682 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Lev, J. M. Romero, D. N.F. Goodman, R. Bagga, H. Y. K. Kim, N. A. Clerk, R. H. Ackerman, and R. G. Gonzalez Total Occlusion versus Hairline Residual Lumen of the Internal Carotid Arteries: Accuracy of Single Section Helical CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1123 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Tomandl, E. Klotz, R. Handschu, B. Stemper, F. Reinhardt, W. J. Huk, K.E. Eberhardt, and S. Fateh-Moghadam Comprehensive Imaging of Ischemic Stroke with Multisection CT RadioGraphics, May 1, 2003; 23(3): 565 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Smith, H. C. Roberts, N. A. Chuang, K. C. Ong, T. J. Lee, S. C. Johnston, and W. P. Dillon Safety and Feasibility of a CT Protocol for Acute Stroke: Combined CT, CT Angiography, and CT Perfusion Imaging in 53 Consecutive Patients AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2003; 24(4): 688 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Nguyen-Huynh, M. H. Lev, and G. Rordorf Spontaneous Recanalization of Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34(4): 1032 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Corti, M. Alerci, R. Wyttenbach, P. L. Pedrazzi, A. Gallino, T. Hirai, and Y. Korogi Usefulness of Multiplanar Reconstructions in Evaluation of Carotid CT Angiography * Drs Hirai and Korogi respond: Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 290 - 292. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Walker, A. Ismail, W. McMeekin, D. Lambert, A. D. Mendelow, and D. Birchall Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque: Correlation With Histopathology of Endarterectomy Specimens Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 977 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S M Thomas The current role of catheter angiography Imaging, December 15, 2001; 13(5): 366 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C.C. Johnston and L. B. Goldstein Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 1009 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |