Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2000;31:2168-2174

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Angiography
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2000;31:2168.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contribution

CT Angiography for the Detection and Characterization of Carotid Artery Bifurcation Disease

Glenn B. Anderson, MD, MSc; Rob Ashforth, MD; David E. Steinke, MD, MSc; Reka Ferdinandy, MD J. Max Findlay, MD, PhD

From the Divisions of Neurosurgery (G.B.A., D.E.S., J.M.F.) and Diagnostic Imaging (R.A., R.F.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Correspondence to J. Max Findlay, MD, Division of Neurosurgery, 2D1.02 WMC, University of Alberta, 8440 112 St, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7.

Background and Purpose—Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a relatively new and minimally invasive method of imaging intracranial and extracranial blood vessels. The main purpose of this study was to compare CTA to the current gold standard of arterial imaging, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), for the detection and quantification of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis. We also compared Doppler ultrasound (US) with these 2 techniques.

Methods—In a prospective study, 40 patients (80 carotid arteries) underwent CTA, US, and DSA. Patients chosen for inclusion were symptomatic with TIAs or stroke and had initial US screening that indicated >50% carotid stenosis on the side appropriate for the symptoms. Source axial, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and shaded-surface display (SSD) images were produced for each CTA study. The US, CTA, and DSA images were reviewed, with the degree of stenosis quantified and presence of ulcers determined; each type of imaging was reviewed by a separate investigator blinded to the results of the other 2 modalities. The results of CTA and US imaging were compared with the DSA images for degrees of carotid stenosis.

Results—CTA source axial images correlated with DSA more closely than MIP or SSD images for all degrees of stenosis. The correlation between US and DSA (0.808) was poorer than that between CTA and DSA (0.892 to 0.922). CTA performed well in the detection of mild (0% to 29%) carotid stenosis, as well as carotid occlusion, with values for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy near 100%. In determining that a stenosis was >50% by DSA measurement, CTA was again useful, with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 91%, and 90%, respectively. While CTA was quite specific and accurate in identifying degrees of stenoses in either the 50% to 69% or the 70% to 99% ranges, in this task it was much less sensitive: 65% for 50%–69% stenosis and 73% for 70%–99% stenosis. These results did not change significantly when only the data from the most clinically relevant symptomatic arteries were analyzed. CTA was found to correlate quite well with DSA in the detection of ulcers associated with the carotid stenosis.

Conclusions—CTA was found to be an excellent examination for the detection of carotid occlusion and categorization of stenosis in either the 0%–29% or >50% ranges. However, CTA was unable to reliably distinguish between moderate (50%–69%) and severe (70%–99%) stenosis, which is an important limitation in the investigation and treatment of carotid stenosis.


Key Words: angiography, computed tomographic • carotid endarterectomy • carotid stenosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Wintermark, S.S. Jawadi, J.H. Rapp, T. Tihan, E. Tong, D.V. Glidden, S. Abedin, S. Schaeffer, G. Acevedo-Bolton, B. Boudignon, et al.
High-Resolution CT Imaging of Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 875 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. B. Dahl, A. Yndestad, M. Skjelland, E. Oie, A. Dahl, A. Michelsen, J. K. Damas, S. H. Tunheim, T. Ueland, C. Smith, et al.
Increased Expression of Visfatin in Macrophages of Human Unstable Carotid and Coronary Atherosclerosis: Possible Role in Inflammation and Plaque Destabilization
Circulation, February 27, 2007; 115(8): 972 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Matsumoto, N. Kodama, Y. Endo, J. Sakuma, Ky. Suzuki, T. Sasaki, K. Murakami, Ke. Suzuki, T. Katakura, and F. Shishido
Dynamic 3D-CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2007; 28(2): 299 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox
Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H.M. Silvennoinen, S. Ikonen, L. Soinne, M. Railo, and L. Valanne
CT Angiographic Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Manual Assessment, Semiautomatic Vessel Analysis, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 97 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox
Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 632 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Bartlett, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox
Correlation of Carotid Stenosis Diameter and Cross-Sectional Areas with CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 638 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox
Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 13 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. J. Alberts, R. E. Latchaw, W. R. Selman, T. Shephard, M. N. Hadley, L. M. Brass, W. Koroshetz, J. R. Marler, J. Booss, R. D. Zorowitz, et al.
Recommendations for Comprehensive Stroke Centers: A Consensus Statement From the Brain Attack Coalition
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1597 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Berg, Z. Zhang, A. Ikonen, P. Sipola, R. Kalviainen, H. Manninen, and R. Vanninen
Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography in the Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease in Symptomatic Patients: Comparison with Rotational Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1022 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Matsumoto, N. Kodama, J. Sakuma, S. Sato, M. Oinuma, Y. Konno, K. Suzuki, T. Sasaki, K. Suzuki, T. Katakura, et al.
3D-CT Arteriography and 3D-CT Venography: The Separate Demonstration of Arterial-Phase and Venous-Phase on 3D-CT Angiography in a Single Procedure
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 635 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. J.W. Koelemay, P. J. Nederkoorn, J. B. Reitsma, and C. B. Majoie
Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease
Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2306 - 2312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
K. C. Wang, D. Saloner, and J. H. Rapp
Characteristics of Carotid Plaque as Risk Factors for Stroke
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, September 1, 2004; 16(3): 193 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
T. E. Feasby and J. M. Findlay
CT angiography for the assessment of carotid stenosis
Neurology, August 10, 2004; 63(3): 412 - 413.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. A. Josephson, S. O. Bryant, H. K. Mak, S. C. Johnston, W. P. Dillon, and W. S. Smith
Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA
Neurology, August 10, 2004; 63(3): 457 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos
Noninvasive Carotid Imaging
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. W. Olin, J. A. Kaufman, D. A. Bluemke, R. O. Bonow, M. D. Gerhard, M. R. Jaff, G. D. Rubin, and W. Hall
Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group IV: Imaging
Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2626 - 2633.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. Kennedy, H. Quan, W. A. Ghali, and T. E. Feasby
Importance of the imaging modality in decision making about carotid endarterectomy
Neurology, March 23, 2004; 62(6): 901 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Nonent, J.-M. Serfaty, N. Nighoghossian, F. Rouhart, L. Derex, C. Rotaru, P. Chirossel, B. Guias, J.-F. Heautot, P. Gouny, et al.
Concordance Rate Differences of 3 Noninvasive Imaging Techniques to Measure Carotid Stenosis in Clinical Routine Practice: Results of the CARMEDAS Multicenter Study
Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 682 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. H. Lev, J. M. Romero, D. N.F. Goodman, R. Bagga, H. Y. K. Kim, N. A. Clerk, R. H. Ackerman, and R. G. Gonzalez
Total Occlusion versus Hairline Residual Lumen of the Internal Carotid Arteries: Accuracy of Single Section Helical CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1123 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. F. Tomandl, E. Klotz, R. Handschu, B. Stemper, F. Reinhardt, W. J. Huk, K.E. Eberhardt, and S. Fateh-Moghadam
Comprehensive Imaging of Ischemic Stroke with Multisection CT
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2003; 23(3): 565 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W. S. Smith, H. C. Roberts, N. A. Chuang, K. C. Ong, T. J. Lee, S. C. Johnston, and W. P. Dillon
Safety and Feasibility of a CT Protocol for Acute Stroke: Combined CT, CT Angiography, and CT Perfusion Imaging in 53 Consecutive Patients
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2003; 24(4): 688 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. N. Nguyen-Huynh, M. H. Lev, and G. Rordorf
Spontaneous Recanalization of Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion
Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34(4): 1032 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Corti, M. Alerci, R. Wyttenbach, P. L. Pedrazzi, A. Gallino, T. Hirai, and Y. Korogi
Usefulness of Multiplanar Reconstructions in Evaluation of Carotid CT Angiography * Drs Hirai and Korogi respond:
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 290 - 292.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. J. Walker, A. Ismail, W. McMeekin, D. Lambert, A. D. Mendelow, and D. Birchall
Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque: Correlation With Histopathology of Endarterectomy Specimens
Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 977 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S M Thomas
The current role of catheter angiography
Imaging, December 15, 2001; 13(5): 366 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. C.C. Johnston and L. B. Goldstein
Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography
Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 1009 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]