This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Qureshi, A. I. Articles by Hopkins, L. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Qureshi, A. I. Articles by Hopkins, L. N.

(Stroke. 2001;32:2287.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Role of Conventional Angiography in Evaluation of Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis Demonstrated by Doppler Ultrasound in General Practice

Adnan I. Qureshi, MD; M. Fareed K. Suri, MD; Zulfiqar Ali, MD; Stanley H. Kim, MD; Richard D. Fessler, MD; Andrew J. Ringer, MD; Lee R. Guterman, PhD, MD; James L. Budny, MD L. Nelson Hopkins, MD

From the Department of Neurosurgery and Toshiba Stroke Research Center, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo.

Correspondence to Adnan I. Qureshi, MD, SUNYAB Department of Neurosurgery, Millard Fillmore Hospital, 3 Gates Circle, Buffalo, NY 14209-1194. E-mail aiqureshi{at}hotmail.com

Background and Purpose—— Previous studies have suggested that patients with carotid stenosis who are candidates for endarterectomy can be effectively identified on the basis of carotid Doppler ultrasound alone. Before widespread acceptance of this policy, the accuracy of carotid Doppler ultrasound outside selected centers and clinical trials needs to be evaluated. We performed a 12-month prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of Doppler ultrasound in identifying patients for carotid intervention in general practice settings.

Methods—— Each patient referred to our endovascular service for diagnostic angiography to evaluate for carotid stenosis was interviewed and examined by a neurologist. Subjects consisted of symptomatic patients with 50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with 60% stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Information pertaining to demographic and cerebrovascular risk factors and the results of the carotid Doppler ultrasound were recorded. The severity of stenosis on angiograms was measured with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria by a blinded observer. The results of both studies were compared to determine the relative accuracy of ultrasound results.

Results—— Of 130 patients (mean age, 69±8.8 years) who met Doppler ultrasound criteria, 22 (17%) and 8 patients (6%) were found to have 30% to 49% or <30% stenosis by angiography, respectively. The positive predictive value of carotid Doppler ultrasound for identifying appropriate symptomatic candidates for carotid intervention (angiographic stenosis 50%) was 80%, with a false-positive value of 20%. The positive predictive value of carotid Doppler ultrasound for identifying appropriate asymptomatic candidates for carotid intervention (angiographic stenosis 60%) was 59%, with a false-positive value of 41%. Carotid endarterectomy or angioplasty and stent placement were undertaken subsequently in 60 (46%) of the patients. In 94 patients who underwent cerebral angiography alone, no complications were observed.

Conclusions—— The present accuracy of carotid Doppler ultrasound in general practice does not justify its use as the sole basis of selecting appropriate patients for carotid intervention. Given the relatively low rate of associated morbidity with present day techniques, additional confirmatory studies such as angiography should be performed in every patient before a decision regarding intervention is made.

Key Words: angiography • carotid endarterectomy • carotid stenosis • stroke, ischemicN • ultrasonography, Doppler

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. R. Bates, C. J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, W. A. Gray, K. Ouriel, E. D. Peterson, K. Rosenfield, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting) Vascular Medicine, February 1, 2007; 12(1): 35 - 83. [PDF]

				E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic N, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, E. R. Bates, J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey Jr, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2007; 49(1): 126 - 170. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.S. Bartlett, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox Correlation of Carotid Stenosis Diameter and Cross-Sectional Areas with CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 638 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Sabeti, M. Schillinger, W. Mlekusch, A. Willfort, M. Haumer, T. Nachtmann, M. Mullner, W. Lang, R. Ahmadi, and E. Minar Quantification of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis with Duplex US: Comparative Analysis of Different Flow Velocity Criteria Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 431 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Bittl and A. T. Hirsch Concomitant Peripheral Arterial Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: Therapeutic Opportunities Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25): 3136 - 3144. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Borisch, M. Horn, B. Butz, N. Zorger, B. Draganski, T. Hoelscher, U. Bogdahn, and J. Link Preoperative Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Duplex Sonography with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, and M.G. M. Hunink Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1324 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Fellner, W. Lang, A. I. Qureshi, S. H. Kim, M. F. K. Suri, and L. N. Hopkins The Way Out * Response Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 1948 - 1949. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J.M. Barnett, H. E. Meldrum, and M. Eliasziw The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 1, 2002; 166(9): 1169 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Ballotta, G. Da Giau, C. Baracchini, A. I. Qureshi, M.F. K. Suri, Z. Ali, S. H. Kim, and L.N. Hopkins An Unjustified Return to the Past * Response Stroke, March 1, 2002; 33(3): 879 - 881. [Full Text] [PDF]