doi: 10.1161/hs1101.097391
(Stroke. 2001;32:2522.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Major Variation in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy
A Possible Risk Factor for Plaque Development?
From the Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, England.
Reprint requests to Dr Peter Rothwell, Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6HE, England. E-mail peter.rothwell{at}clneuro.ox.ac.uk
Background and Purpose—— Why is carotid plaque often so strikingly asymmetrical within individuals, and why does the extent of disease vary so considerably between individuals with similar systemic risk factors? Variability of carotid bifurcation anatomy is a possible explanation. Flow models suggest that vessel anatomy, in particular vessel diameter and area ratios, affects plaque formation at arterial bifurcations. However, carotid bifurcation anatomy could only be a major risk factor for plaque formation if it was sufficiently variable. Since very few data exist on the extent of interindividual and intraindividual variability of bifurcation anatomy, we studied 5395 angiograms from the European Carotid Surgery Trial.
Methods—— To minimize changes in bifurcation anatomy secondary to atherosclerosis, we excluded vessels with 
30% stenosis. We measured arterial diameters at disease-free points and calculated the following ratios: internal to common carotid (ICA/CCA), external to common carotid (ECA/CCA), external to internal carotid (ECA/ICA), and outflow/inflow area. For intraindividual asymmetry, we compared the ratios on both sides.
Results—— Each ratio varied markedly between individuals. The 95% ranges were as follows: ICA/CCA, 0.44 to 0.86; ECA/CCA, 0.34 to 0.80; ECA/ICA, 0.55 to 1.33; and outflow/inflow area, 0.38 to 1.28. The results were very similar in 407 bifurcations with no disease. Among the 755 patients with <30% stenosis bilaterally, side differences of 25% were present in 17% (95% CI, 15% to 20%) for the ICA/CCA ratio, 27% (95% CI, 24% to 30%) for the ECA/CCA ratio, 32% (95% CI, 28% to 35%) for the ECA/ICA ratio, and 42% (95% CI, 38% to 45%) for the outflow/inflow area ratio.
Conclusions—— We found large interindividual differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy. For example, there was 4-fold variation of the ratio of outflow to inflow area. Intraindividual variation was also considerable. These data highlight the potential importance of anatomic variation as a risk factor for atheroma and provide a firm basis for flow modeling studies.
Key Words: angiography • carotid arteries • risk factors • stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S.-W. Lee, L. Antiga, J. D. Spence, and D. A. Steinman Geometry of the Carotid Bifurcation Predicts Its Exposure to Disturbed Flow Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2341 - 2347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Touze, C. P. Warlow, and P. M. Rothwell Risk of Coronary and Other Nonstroke Vascular Death in Relation to the Presence and Extent of Atherosclerotic Disease at the Carotid Bifurcation Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 2904 - 2909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. Thomas, L. Antiga, S. L. Che, J. S. Milner, D. A. Hangan Steinman, J. D. Spence, B. K. Rutt, and D. A. Steinman Variation in the Carotid Bifurcation Geometry of Young Versus Older Adults: Implications for Geometric Risk of Atherosclerosis Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2450 - 2456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Fox, M. Eliasziw, P. M. Rothwell, M. H. Schmidt, C. P. Warlow, H. J.M. Barnett, and for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarte Identification, Prognosis, and Management of Patients with Carotid Artery Near Occlusion AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2086 - 2094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Dick, C. Sherif, S. Sabeti, J. Amighi, E. Minar, and M. Schillinger Gender Differences in Outcome of Conservatively Treated Patients With Asymptomatic High Grade Carotid Stenosis Stroke, June 1, 2005; 36(6): 1178 - 1183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Iemolo, A. Martiniuk, D. A. Steinman, and J. D. Spence Sex Differences in Carotid Plaque and Stenosis Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 477 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Rothwell For Severe Carotid Stenosis Found on Ultrasound, Further Arterial Evaluation Prior to Carotid Endarterectomy Is Unnecessary: The Argument Against Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1817 - 1819. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sitzer, D. Puac, A. Buehler, D. A. Steckel, S. von Kegler, H. S. Markus, and H. Steinmetz Internal Carotid Artery Angle of Origin: A Novel Risk Factor for Early Carotid Atherosclerosis Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34(4): 950 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Jerrard-Dunne, H. S. Markus, D. A. Steckel, A. Buehler, S. von Kegler, and M. Sitzer Early Carotid Atherosclerosis and Family History of Vascular Disease: Specific Effects on Arterial Sites Have Implications for Genetic Studies Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2003; 23(2): 302 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Rothwell, S. A. Gutnikov, and C. P. Warlow Reanalysis of the Final Results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 514 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. Adams, D. M. Simoni, C. B. Bordelon Jr, G. W. Vick III, K. T. Kimball, W. Insull Jr, and J. D. Morrisett Bilateral Symmetry of Human Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis Stroke, November 1, 2002; 33(11): 2575 - 2580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|