This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liapis, C. D. Articles by Kostakis, A. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Liapis, C. D. Articles by Kostakis, A. G. Related Collections Carotid endarterectomy Risk Factors Carotid Stenosis Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc. Risk Factors for Stroke

(Stroke. 2001;32:2782.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Carotid Stenosis

Factors Affecting Symptomatology

Christos D. Liapis, MD, FACS; John D. Kakisis, MD Alkiviadis G. Kostakis, MD

From the Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Correspondence to Dr Christos Liapis, 131 Vas. Sofias Ave, 11521 Athens, Greece. E-mail liapis{at}hol.gr

Background and Purpose— The ability to predict future strokes in asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis is currently limited. The management of symptomatic patients with <50% stenosis is also debatable. In this context, we performed the following open prospective study to identify factors affecting symptomatology in patients with carotid stenosis.

Methods— During 1988–1997, 442 arteries with various degrees of stenosis were followed with the use of color Duplex ultrasonography every 6 months. The main outcome measures were development of symptoms related to the carotid territory and progression in the degree of stenosis. Results of follow-up were analyzed in relation to the traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis as well as the ultrasonographic characteristics of the plaques. Statistical analysis was performed by multiple linear and Cox regression analysis.

Results— Mean duration of follow-up was 44 months (range, 12 to 120 months). Significant progression of stenosis occurred in 18.5% of the cases and was more frequent in younger patients (P=0.09), in patients with coronary artery disease (P=0.02), and in patients with echolucent plaques (P=0.02). In regard to clinical presentation, men (P=0.07), hypertensives (P=0.07), and patients with echolucent plaques (P=0.09) showed a trend toward higher frequency of stroke in their history. During the follow-up period, neurological events developed in 12.4% of the cases and were associated with the severity of carotid disease (P<0.001), history of neurological events (P=0.02), progression of stenosis (P=0.002), echolucent plaques (P=0.01), and hypertension (P=0.02).

Conclusions— Factors other than degree of stenosis and history of neurological events are also important in determining high-risk carotid plaque. In our study hypertension, echolucent plaques, and progressive lesions were associated with an increased risk of neurological events. These factors should be taken into consideration in determining treatment strategies for carotid stenosis.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • carotid stenosis • cerebrovascular disorders • risk factors • ultrasonography

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Gaudiello, V. Colangelo, F. Bolacchi, M. Melis, R. Gandini, F.G. Garaci, V. Cozzolino, R. Floris, and G. Simonetti Sixty-Four-Section CT Cerebral Perfusion Evaluation in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis before and after Stenting with a Cerebral Protection Device AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 919 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.N.E. Redgrave, J.K. Lovett, P.J. Gallagher, and P.M. Rothwell Histological Assessment of 526 Symptomatic Carotid Plaques in Relation to the Nature and Timing of Ischemic Symptoms: The Oxford Plaque Study Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): 2320 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Moftakhar, A. S. Turk, D. B. Niemann, S. Hussain, S. Rajpal, T. Cook, M. Geraghty, B. Aagaard-Kienitz, P. A. Turski, and G. C. Newman Effects of Carotid or Vertebrobasilar Stent Placement on Cerebral Perfusion and Cognition AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2005; 26(7): 1772 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Findlay Editorial Comment--Plaque Pathology and Patient Selection for Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 257 - 258. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Biasi, A. Froio, E. B. Diethrich, G. Deleo, S. Galimberti, P. Mingazzini, A. N. Nicolaides, M. Griffin, D. Raithel, D. B. Reid, et al. Carotid Plaque Echolucency Increases the Risk of Stroke in Carotid Stenting: The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) Study Circulation, August 10, 2004; 110(6): 756 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Golemati, T. J. Tegos, A. Sassano, K. S. Nikita, and A. N. Nicolaides Echogenicity of B-mode Sonographic Images of the Carotid Artery: Work in Progress J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2004; 23(5): 659 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Orlandi, S. Fanucchi, F. Sartucci, L. Murri, C. D. Liapis, J. D. Kakisis, and A. G. Kostakis Can Microembolic Signals Identify Unstable Plaques Affecting Symptomatology in Carotid Stenosis? * Response Stroke, July 1, 2002; 33 (7): 1744 - 1746. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Liapis Carotid Surgery in Europe: Why Do We Think Differently than in the United States? Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 2002; 15(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. Ricotta Expert Commentary Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 2002; 15(1): 53 - 56. [PDF]