doi: 10.1161/hs1201.099649
(Stroke. 2001;32:2787.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Redo Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Primary Carotid Endarterectomy
From the Department of Surgery (A.F.A., T.G.J.), Charleston Area Medical Center, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center of West Virginia University (L.T.), Charleston, WV; Camcare Health Education and Research Institute (J.T.W.), Charleston, WV; and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc (P.A.R.), Ridgefield, Conn.
Correspondence to Ali F. AbuRahma, MD, 3100 MacCorkle Ave SE, Suite 603, Charleston, WV 25304. E-mail Ali.aburahma{at}camcare.com
Background and Purpose— Several authorities have recently advocated carotid stenting for recurrent carotid stenosis because of the perception that redo surgery has a higher complication rate than primary carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study compares the early and late results of reoperations versus primary CEA.
Methods— All reoperations for recurrent carotid stenosis performed during a recent 7-year period by a single vascular surgeon were compared with primary CEA. Because all redo CEAs were done with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or vein patch closure, we only analyzed those primary CEAs that used the same patch closures. A Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis was used to estimate stroke-free survival rates and freedom from 
50% recurrent stenosis.
Results— Of 547 primary CEAs, 265 had PTFE or saphenous vein patch closure, and 124 reoperations had PTFE or vein patch closure during the same period. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. The indications for reoperation and primary CEA were symptomatic stenosis in 78% and 58% of cases and asymptomatic 80% stenosis in 22% and 42% of cases, respectively (P<0.001). The 30-day perioperative stroke and transient ischemic attack rates for reoperation and primary CEA were 4.8% versus 0.8% (P=0.015) and 4% versus 1.1%, respectively, with no perioperative deaths in either group. Cranial nerve injury was noted in 17% of reoperation patients versus 5.3% of primary CEA patients; however, most of these injuries were transient (P<0.001). Mean hospital stay was 1.8 days for reoperation versus 1.6 days for primary CEA. Cumulative rates of stroke-free survival and freedom from 50% recurrent stenosis for reoperation and primary CEA at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96%, 91%, and 82% and 98%, 96%, and 95% versus 94%, 92%, and 91% and 98%, 96%, and 96%, respectively (no significant differences).
Conclusions— Reoperation carries higher perioperative stroke and cranial nerve injury rates than primary CEA. However, reoperations are durable and have stroke-free survival rates that are similar to primary CEA. These considerations should be kept in mind when carotid stenting is recommended instead of reoperation.
Key Words: carotid endarterectomy • carotid stenosis • recurrence • stents
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  P. Harrod-Kim, Y. Kadkhodayan, C. P. Derdeyn, D. T. Cross III, and C. J. Moran Outcomes of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting for Radiation-Associated Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2005; 26(7): 1781 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. C. Cothren, E. E. Moore, C. E. Ray Jr, D. J. Ciesla, J. L. Johnson, J. B. Moore, and J. M. Burch Carotid Artery Stents for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Risks Exceed Benefits Arch Surg, May 1, 2005; 140(5): 480 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Eskandari, G. M. Longo, J. D. Vijungco, M. D. Morasch, and W. H. Pearce Does Carotid Stenting Measure Up to Endarterectomy?: A Vascular Surgeon's Experience Arch Surg, July 1, 2004; 139(7): 734 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Bond, K. Rerkasem, and P.M. Rothwell Systematic Review of the Risks of Carotid Endarterectomy in Relation to the Clinical Indication for and Timing of Surgery Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2290 - 2301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|