Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2001;32:2803-2809
doi: 10.1161/hs1201.099714
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devuyst, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bogousslavsky, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Devuyst, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bogousslavsky, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Pathology of Stroke
Right arrow Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention

(Stroke. 2001;32:2803.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Automatic Classification of HITS Into Artifacts or Solid or Gaseous Emboli by a Wavelet Representation Combined With Dual-Gate TCD

G. Devuyst, MD; G.A. Darbellay, PhD; J.-M. Vesin, PhD; V. Kemény, MD; M. Ritter, MD; D.W. Droste, MD; C. Molina, MD; J. Serena, MD; R. Sztajzel, MD; P. Ruchat, MD; C. Lucchesi, PhD; G. Dietler, PhD; E.B. Ringelstein, MD; P.-A. Despland, MD J. Bogousslavsky, MD

From the Department of Neurology, CHUV (G. Devuyst, V.K., P.R., P.-A.D., J.B.), the Signal Processing Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (G.A.D., J.-M.V.), and the Department of Applied Physics, UNIL (C.L., G. Dietler), Lausanne, and the Department of Neurology, HCUG (R.S.), Geneva, Switzerland; the Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Münster, Germany (M.R., D.W.D., E.B.R.); and the Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Barcelona (C.M.), and the Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Girona (J.S.), Spain.

Correspondence to Gérald Devuyst, Department of Neurology, CHUV, rue du Bugnon 15, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail gerald.devuyst{at}chuv.hospvd.ch or Georges Darbellay, Signal Processing Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail georges.darbellay@epfl.ch

Background and Purpose Transcranial Doppler (TCD) can detect high-intensity transient signals (HITS) in the cerebral circulation. HITS may correspond to artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli. The aim of this study was to develop an offline automated Doppler system allowing the classification of HITS.

Methods We studied 600 HITS in vivo, including 200 artifacts from normal subjects, 200 solid emboli from patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis, and 200 gaseous emboli in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale. The study was 2-fold, each part involving 300 HITS (100 of each type). The first 300 HITS (learning set) were used to construct an automated classification algorithm. The remaining 300 HITS (validation set) were used to check the validity of this algorithm. To classify HITS, we combined dual-gate TCD with a wavelet representation and compared it with the current "gold standard," the human experts.

Results A combination of the peak frequency of HITS and the time delay makes it possible to separate artifacts from emboli. On the validation set, we achieved a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 99%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. To distinguish between solid and gaseous emboli, where positive refers now to the solid emboli, we used the peak frequency, the relative power, and the envelope symmetry of HITS. On the validation set, we achieved a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 86%, a conditional PPV of 89%, and a conditional NPV of 89%.

Conclusions An automated wavelet representation combined with dual-gate TCD can reliably reject artifacts from emboli. From a clinical standpoint, however, this approach has only a fair accuracy in differentiating between solid and gaseous emboli.


Key Words: HITS • solid/gaseous emboli • automated system • dual-gate TCD • wavelets




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
J. Lynch and J. Riley
Microemboli detection on extracorporeal bypass circuitsa
Perfusion, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 23 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Saqqur, N. Dean, M. Schebel, M. D. Hill, A. Salam, A. Shuaib, and A. M. Demchuk
Improved Detection of Microbubble Signals Using Power M-Mode Doppler
Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35 (1): e14 - e17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Brucher and D. Russell
Automatic Online Embolus Detection and Artifact Rejection With the First Multifrequency Transcranial Doppler
Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 1969 - 1974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Russell and R. Brucher
Online Automatic Discrimination Between Solid and Gaseous Cerebral Microemboli With the First Multifrequency Transcranial Doppler
Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 1975 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]