This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tilling, K. Articles by Wolfe, C. D.A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tilling, K. Articles by Wolfe, C. D.A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Epidemiology Cerebrovascular disease/stroke Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2001;32:2867.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

A New Method for Predicting Recovery After Stroke

Kate Tilling, PhD; Jonathan A.C. Sterne, PhD; Anthony G. Rudd, FRCP; Thomas A. Glass, PhD; Robert J. Wityk, MD Charles D.A. Wolfe, MD

From the Department of Public Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK (K.T., C.D.A.W.); Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (J.A.C.S.); Elderly Care Unit, Guy’s King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK (A.G.R.); and Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health (T.A.G.), and Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (R.J.W.), Baltimore, Md.

Correspondence to Kate Tilling, Department of Public Health Sciences, King’s College London, 5th Floor, Capital House, 42 Weston St, London SE1 3QD, UK. E-mail kate.tilling{at}kcl.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Several prognostic factors have been identified for outcome after stroke. However, there is a need for empirically derived models that can predict outcome and assist in medical management during rehabilitation. To be useful, these models should take into account early changes in recovery and individual patient characteristics. We present such a model and demonstrate its clinical utility.

Methods— Data on functional recovery (Barthel Index) at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months after stroke were collected prospectively for 299 stroke patients at 2 London hospitals. Multilevel models were used to model recovery trajectories, allowing for day-to-day and between-patient variation. The predictive performance of the model was validated with an independent cohort of 710 stroke patients.

Results— Urinary incontinence, sex, prestroke disability, and dysarthria affected the level of outcome after stroke; age, dysphasia, and limb deficit also affected the rate of recovery. Applying this to the validation cohort, the average difference between predicted and observed Barthel Index was -0.4, with 90% limits of agreement from -7 to 6. Predicted Barthel Index lay within 3 points of the observed Barthel Index on 49% of occasions and improved to 69% when patients’ recovery histories were taken into account.

Conclusions— The model predicts recovery at various stages of rehabilitation in ways that could improve clinical decision making. Predictions can be altered in light of observed recovery. This model is a potentially useful tool for comparing individual patients with average recovery trajectories. Patients at elevated risk could be identified and interventions initiated.

Key Words: activities of daily living • disability evaluation • models, statistical • prognosis • recovery of function

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H F Lingsma, D W J Dippel, S E Hoeks, E W Steyerberg, C L Franke, R J van Oostenbrugge, G de Jong, M L Simoons, W J M Scholte op Reimer, and The Netherlands Stroke Survey investigators Variation between hospitals in patient outcome after stroke is only partly explained by differences in quality of care: results from the Netherlands Stroke Survey J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 79(8): 888 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Dallas, S. Rone-Adams, J. L. Echternach, L. M. Brass, and D. M. Bravata Dependence in Prestroke Mobility Predicts Adverse Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2298 - 2303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. De Wit, K. Putman, B. Schuback, A. Komarek, F. Angst, I. Baert, P. Berman, K. Bogaerts, N. Brinkmann, L. Connell, et al. Motor and Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Comparison of 4 European Rehabilitation Centers Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2101 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Engelter, M. Gostynski, S. Papa, M. Frei, C. Born, V. Ajdacic-Gross, F. Gutzwiller, and P. A. Lyrer Epidemiology of Aphasia Attributable to First Ischemic Stroke: Incidence, Severity, Fluency, Etiology, and Thrombolysis Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1379 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Koyama, K. Matsumoto, T. Okuno, and K. Domen A new method for predicting functional recovery of stroke patients with hemiplegia: logarithmic modelling Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2005; 19(7): 779 - 789. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Yamada, S. Mori, H. Nakamura, H. Ito, O. Kizu, K. Shiga, K. Yoshikawa, M. Makino, S. Yuen, T. Kubota, et al. Fiber-Tracking Method Reveals Sensorimotor Pathway Involvement in Stroke Patients Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34 (9): e159 - e162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]