This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Frauchiger, B. Articles by Staub, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Frauchiger, B. Articles by Staub, D. Related Collections Other arteriosclerosis Imaging Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2001;32:836.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Comparison of Carotid Arterial Resistive Indices With Intima-Media Thickness as Sonographic Markers of Atherosclerosis

Beat Frauchiger, MD; Hans Peter Schmid, MD; Christian Roedel, MD; Peter Moosmann, MD, PhD Daniel Staub, MD

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Angiology (B.F., C.R., D.S.) and Cardiology (H.P.S.), Kantonsspital, Frauenfeld, Switzerland, and the Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital (P.M.), Zurich, Switzerland.

Correspondence to Beat Frauchiger, MD, Head of Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital, CH-8500 Frauenfeld, Switzerland. E-mail beat.frauchiger{at}kttg.ch

Background and Purpose—The intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery is a (morphological) sonographic parameter that depends on the degree of atherosclerosis. In the renal arteries, the value of the (hemodynamic) resistive index (RI) is correlated with the severity of atherosclerosis. In contrast to the well-known IMT, no study has yet applied the carotid RI to estimate generalized atherosclerosis.

Methods—The SMART atherosclerosis risk score was determined in 157 patients (94 men and 63 women; mean age 63 [range 19 to 80] years) with at least 1 vascular risk factor or a known vascular disease. Duplex sonography of the common carotid (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) was then performed, with determination of IMT and RI.

Results—The mean risk score of all patients was 8.8±3.5 (range 1 to 17), the mean IMT value in the CCA was 0.727±0.161 mm, the mean RI in CCA was 0.79±0.066, and the mean RI in ICA was 0.661±0.082. Highly significant correlations were found between the score and IMT CCA and the score and RI ICA (r=0.62, P<0.0001 and r=0.55, P<0.0001). The score–RI CCA correlation was much less marked (r=0.354, P<0.0001). The intraobserver and interobserver agreement was less for IMT than for RI CCA and ICA. The areas under the curve of the receiver operating curves to distinguish between low-risk and high-risk patients resulted in values of 0.86, 0.81, and 0.69 for IMT, RI ICA, and RI CCA, respectively.

Conclusions—Although RI reflects the atherosclerotic process in an indirect manner, the correlation between the RI ICA and the SMART atherosclerosis score as well as the ability to distinguish between low- and high-risk patients are comparable to those of the well-known IMT.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • carotid arteries • ultrasonography

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Abbas and F. Corea Surrogate Sonographic Markers of Atherosclerosis Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1644 - 1644. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Staub, A. Meyerhans, B. Bundi, H. P. Schmid, and B. Frauchiger Prediction of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality: Comparison of the Internal Carotid Artery Resistive Index With the Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness Stroke, March 1, 2006; 37(3): 800 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Unal, S. Bagcier, I. Simsir, Y. Bilgili, and S. Kara Evaluation of Differences Between Observers and Automatic-Manual Measurements in Calculation of Doppler Parameters J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2004; 23(8): 1041 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]