This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rohrberg, M. Articles by Brodhun, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rohrberg, M. Articles by Brodhun, R. Related Collections Carotid Stenosis

(Stroke. 2001;32:1298.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Measurement of Vasomotor Reserve in the Transcranial Doppler-CO₂ Test Using an Ultrasound Contrast Agent (Levovist)

Matthias Rohrberg, MD Rudolf Brodhun, MD

From the Department of Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, Asklepios Kliniken Schildautal, Seesen, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Matthias Rohrberg, Department of Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, Asklepios Kliniken Schildautal, Karl-Herold-Str 1, D-38723 Seesen, Germany. E-mail rbrodhun{at}asklepios.com

Background and Purpose—Determination of vasomotor reserve (VMR) with the transcranial Doppler-CO₂ (TCD-CO₂) test is used to assess the risk of impending cerebral ischemia in patients with high-grade stenosis or occlusion of the internal carotid artery. In patients with a poor temporal window, however, this examination is limited. The aim of this study therefore was to examine whether the use of an ultrasound contrast agent (USCA) influences the results of the TCD-CO₂ test.

Methods—In the first part of the study, 6 control subjects and 20 patients were examined with the TCD-CO₂ test. The VMR was determined first without the application of a contrast agent and then with continuous infusion of an USCA (Levovist, 300 mg/mL, 1 mL/min). In the second part of the study, 2 tests without USCA were performed in each of 13 patients and 2 tests with USCA infusion were performed in each of 12 patients. Statistical analysis included differences between the VMR determined with the 2 comparative measurements (VMR), the mean (M_VMR), and SD.

Results—Based on the mean difference, the TCD-CO₂ test produced the same results with and without USCA (M_VMR 1.8%), although the differences showed a wide distribution (2 SDs, ±20.7%). Similar spreads were seen in repeated determinations of VMR in the same patient without USCA (2 SDs, ±20.0%), whereas the distribution under continuous USCA infusion was considerably smaller (2 SDs, ±8.2%).

Conclusions—The TCD-CO₂ test can be performed with continuous infusion of an USCA without influencing the results. Even with a good temporal window, the results of the TCD-CO₂ test show better reproducibility and thus better reliability if an USCA is used.

Key Words: carotid artery disease • cerebral blood flow • cerebral ischemia • contrast media • ultrasonography, Doppler, transcranial

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. H. R. Claassen, R. Zhang, Q. Fu, S. Witkowski, and B. D. Levine Transcranial Doppler estimation of cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular conductance during modified rebreathing J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 870 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]