(Stroke. 2001;32:1627.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (M.P., C.A., J-L.T.); and the Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, the Unità di Ricerca, Valutazione Funzionale e Verifica di Qualità in Riabilitazione (L.T.), and Divisione di Recupero e Rieducazione Funzionale (L.T., A.Z.), Pavia, Italy.
Background and PurposeChronic hemiparetic patients often retain the ability to manage activities requiring both hands, either through the use of the affected arm or compensation with the unaffected limb. A measure of this overall ability was developed by adapting and validating the ABILHAND questionnaire through the Rasch measurement model. ABILHAND measures the patients perceived difficulty in performing everyday manual activities.
MethodsOne hundred three chronic (>6 months) stroke outpatients (62% men; mean age, 63 years) were assessed (74 in Belgium, 29 in Italy). They lived at home and walked independently and were screened for the absence of major cognitive deficits (dementia, aphasia, hemineglect). The patients were administered the ABILHAND questionnaire, the Brunnström upper limb motricity test, the box-and-block manual dexterity test, the Semmes-Weinstein tactile sensation test, and the Geriatric Depression Scale. The brain lesion type and site were recorded. ABILHAND results were analyzed with the use of Winsteps Rasch software.
ResultsThe Rasch refinement of ABILHAND led to a change from the original unimanual and bimanual 56-item, 4-level scale to a bimanual 23-item, 3-level scale. The resulting ability scale had sufficient sensitivity to be clinically useful. Rasch reliability was 0.90, and the item-difficulty hierarchy was stable across demographic and clinical subgroups. Grip strength, motricity, dexterity, and depression were significantly correlated with the ABILHAND measures.
ConclusionsThe ABILHAND questionnaire results in a valid person-centered measure of manual ability in everyday activities. The stability of the item-difficulty hierarchy across different patient classes further supports the clinical application of the scale.
Key Words: arm disability evaluation rehabilitation stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Durez, V. Fraselle, F. Houssiau, J.-L. Thonnard, H. Nielens, and M. Penta Validation of the ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2007; 66(8): 1098 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. CHEN, C. V. GRANGER, C. A. PEIMER, O. J. MOY, and S. WALD Manual Ability Measure (MAM-16): A Preliminary Report on a New Patient-Centred and Task-Oriented Outcome Measure of Hand Function J Hand Surg Eur Vol., April 1, 2005; 30(2): 207 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Arnould, M. Penta, A. Renders, and J.-L. Thonnard ABILHAND-Kids: A measure of manual ability in children with cerebral palsy Neurology, September 28, 2004; 63(6): 1045 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |