| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2001;32:1635.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke
From the Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.
Correspondence to Dr Steven L. Wolf, Emory University School of Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, 1441 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail swolf{at}emory.edu
Background and Purpose—The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a new time-based method to evaluate upper extremity performance while providing insight into joint-specific and total limb movements. This study addresses selected psychometric attributes of the WMFT applied to a chronic stroke population.
Methods—Nineteen individuals after stroke and with intact cognition and sitting balance were age- and sex-matched with 19 individuals without impairment. Subjects performed the WMFT and the upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) on 2 occasions (12 to 16 days apart), with scoring performed independently by 2 random raters.
Results—The WMFT and FMA demonstrated agreement
(P<0.0001) between raters at
each session. WMFT scores for the dominant and nondominant extremities
of individuals without impairment were different
(P
0.05) from the more and
less affected extremities of subjects after stroke. The FMA score for
the more affected extremity of subjects after stroke was different
(P0.05) from the dominant and
nondominant extremities. However, the FMA score for the less affected
upper extremity of individuals after stroke was not different
(P>0.05) from the dominant and
nondominant extremities of individuals without impairment. The WMFT and
FMA scores were related (P<0.02) for the more affected
extremity in individuals after stroke.
Conclusions—The interrater reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the WMFT, as used in these subject samples, are supported.
Key Words: arm • motor activity • psychometrics • stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  L. V. Gauthier, E. Taub, C. Perkins, M. Ortmann, V. W. Mark, and G. Uswatte Remodeling the Brain: Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke * Supplemental Material Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1520 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. G. Richards, C. R. Senesac, S. B. Davis, M. L. Woodbury, and S. E. Nadeau Bilateral Arm Training With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing in Chronic Stroke: Not Always Efficacious Neurorehabil Neural Repair, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 180 - 184. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Caimmi, S. Carda, C. Giovanzana, E. S. Maini, A. M. Sabatini, N. Smania, and F. Molteni Using Kinematic Analysis to Evaluate Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2008; 22(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, P. C. Clark, and D. Nichols-Larsen Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L Wolf Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1212 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Alon, A. F. Levitt, and P. A. McCarthy Functional Electrical Stimulation Enhancement of Upper Extremity Functional Recovery During Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2007; 21(3): 207 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L Fritz, S. Z George, S. L Wolf, and K. E Light Participant Perception of Recovery as Criterion to Establish Importance of Improvement for Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Outcome Measures: A Preliminary Study Physical Therapy, February 1, 2007; 87(2): 170 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Richards, L. J Gonzalez Rothi, S. Davis, S. S Wu, and S. E Nadeau Limited dose response to Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in patients with chronic stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2006; 20(12): 1066 - 1074. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, C. Giuliani, K. E. Light, D. Nichols-Larsen, and for the EXCITE Investigators Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, November 1, 2006; 296(17): 2095 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Van de Winckel, H. Feys, S. van der Knaap, R. Messerli, F. Baronti, R. Lehmann, B. Van Hemelrijk, F. Pante`, C. Perfetti, and W. De Weerdt Can quality of movement be measured? Rasch analysis and inter-rater reliability of the Motor Evaluation Scale for Upper Extremity in Stroke Patients (MESUPES) Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2006; 20(10): 871 - 884. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-F. Sun, C.-W. Hsu, C.-W. Hwang, P.-T. Hsu, J.-L. Wang, and C.-L. Yang Application of Combined Botulinum Toxin Type A and Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for an Individual With Chronic Upper-Extremity Spasticity After Stroke Physical Therapy, October 1, 2006; 86(10): 1387 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Underwood, P. C Clark, S. Blanton, D. M Aycock, and S. L Wolf Pain, Fatigue, and Intensity of Practice in People With Stroke Who Are Receiving Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Physical Therapy, September 1, 2006; 86(9): 1241 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Raghavan, J. W. Krakauer, and A. M. Gordon Impaired anticipatory control of fingertip forces in patients with a pure motor or sensorimotor lacunar syndrome Brain, June 1, 2006; 129(6): 1415 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. K. King, D. Morris, J. E. Crago, and A. Chatterjee A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity After Stroke Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1045 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Raghavan, E. Petra, J. W. Krakauer, and A. M. Gordon Patterns of Impairment in Digit Independence After Subcortical Stroke J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 369 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Wolf, P. A. Thompson, D. M. Morris, D. K. Rose, C. J. Winstein, E. Taub, C. Giuliani, and S. L. Pearson The EXCITE Trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Patients with Subacute Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2005; 19(3): 194 - 205. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Nichols-Larsen, P.C. Clark, A. Zeringue, A. Greenspan, and S. Blanton Factors Influencing Stroke Survivors' Quality of Life During Subacute Recovery Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1480 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. S. Beekhuizen and E. C. Field-Fote Massed Practice versus Massed Practice with Stimulation: Effects on Upper Extremity Function and Cortical Plasticity in Individuals with Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2005; 19(1): 33 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Koski, T. J. Mernar, and B. H. Dobkin Immediate and Long-Term Changes in Corticomotor Output in Response to Rehabilitation: Correlation with Functional Improvements in Chronic Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2004; 18(4): 230 - 249. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Alberts, A. J. Butler, and S. L. Wolf The Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy on Precision Grip: A Preliminary Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2004; 18(4): 250 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. Luft, S. McCombe-Waller, J. Whitall, L. W. Forrester, R. Macko, J. D. Sorkin, J. B. Schulz, A. P. Goldberg, and D. F. Hanley Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training and Motor Cortex Activation in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, October 20, 2004; 292(15): 1853 - 1861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-W. Park, A. J. Butler, V. Cavalheiro, J. L. Alberts, and S. L. Wolf Changes in Serial Optical Topography and TMS during Task Performance after Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Stroke: A Case Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2004; 18(2): 95 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.H. van der Lee, H. Beckerman, D.L. Knol, H.C.W. de Vet, and L.M. Bouter Clinimetric Properties of the Motor Activity Log for the Assessment of Arm Use in Hemiparetic Patients Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1410 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Pierce, K. G. Gallagher, S. W. Schaumburg, A. M. Gershkoff, J. P. Gaughan, and L. Shutter Home Forced Use in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Program for Adults with Hemiplegia: A Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2003; 17(4): 214 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, D. Nichols, and S. Wolf Methods for a Multisite Randomized Trial to Investigate the Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Improving Upper Extremity Function among Adults Recovering from a Cerebrovascular Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2003; 17(3): 137 - 152. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Duncan, S. Studenski, L. Richards, S. Gollub, S. M. Lai, D. Reker, S. Perera, J. Yates, V. Koch, S. Rigler, et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of Therapeutic Exercise in Subacute Stroke Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2173 - 2180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Bonifer and K. M Anderson Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for an Individual With Severe Chronic Upper-Extremity Hemiplegia Physical Therapy, April 1, 2003; 83(4): 384 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. F. Wittenberg, R. Chen, K. Ishii, K. O. Bushara, E. Taub, L. H. Gerber, M. Hallett, and L. G. Cohen Constraint-Induced Therapy in Stroke: Magnetic-Stimulation Motor Maps and Cerebral Activation Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2003; 17(1): 48 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|