Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2001;32:1855-1859

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dietz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sitzer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dietz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sitzer, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carotid endarterectomy
Right arrow Angioplasty and Stenting
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Angiography
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2001;32:1855.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis Using Stent Placement

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With a Balanced Surgical Risk/Benefit Ratio

Andreas Dietz, MD; Joachim Berkefeld, MD; Jacques G. Theron, MD; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen, MD; Friedhelm E. Zanella, MD; Bernd Turowski, MD; Helmuth Steinmetz, MD Matthias Sitzer, MD

From the Departments of Neurology (A.D., H.S., M.S.), Neuroradiology (J.B., F.E.Z., B.T.), and Vascular Surgery (T.S-R.), Johann Wolfgang Goethe–University Frankfurt am Main, Germany, and Department of Neuroradiology and Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire, Caen, France (J.G.T.).

Correspondence to Matthias Sitzer, MD, Department of Neurology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe–University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, D-60528 Frankfurt/Main, Germany. E-mail sitzer{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de

Background and Purpose— Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is not necessarily beneficial in all patients with symptomatic high-grade (>=70%) internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Independent risk factors modulate both the individual stroke risk under medical treatment and the combined stroke and death risk after CEA. Endovascular stenting of symptomatic ICA stenosis may be an alternative to CEA in patients with a balanced surgical risk/benefit ratio.

Methods— We included 43 patients (71% men; median age, 67 years) with a recently symptomatic ICA stenosis with >=70% luminal narrowing in whom the individual sum of medical and surgical risk factors suggested a balanced surgical risk/benefit ratio (risk-modeling appraisal derived from the European Carotid Surgery Trial). After stenting of the stenosed ICA with distal balloon protection, the mean±SD follow-up, including clinical and ultrasonographic examinations, was 20±11.8 months, with a median number of examinations of 5 per patient.

Results— Recanalization of ICA stenoses was technically successful in 40 of 43 procedures (93%). Within the 30-day postinterventional period 1 death occurred (2.5%), and the combined stroke and death rate within follow-up was 5%. Except for 1 asymptomatic ICA occlusion, no restenosis >=70% occurred during follow-up.

Conclusions— ICA stenting in symptomatic patients with a balanced surgical risk/benefit ratio is technically feasible, with a low periprocedural risk of stroke or death. Furthermore, the risk of future stroke and rate of significant restenosis during long-term follow-up appears to be low, suggesting that ICA stenting may be useful in carotid revascularization and stroke prevention.


Key Words: angiography, digital subtraction • carotid artery diseases • carotid stenosis • cerebrovascular disorders • endovascular therapy • stents • ultrasonography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. Puato, C. Piergentili, M. Zanardo, R. Rocchi, M. Giordan, P. Cardaioli, and P. Pauletto
Vascular Remodeling After Carotid Artery Stenting
Angiology, November 1, 2007; 58(5): 565 - 571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Tepe, P. Muschick, M. Laule, F. Reddig, C. D. Claussen, L. M. Dinkelborg, H. Tielemans, M. Wehrmann, and S. H. Duda
Prevention of Carotid Artery Restenosis After Sirolimus-Coated Stent Implantation in Pigs
Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 492 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Cosottini, M. C. Michelassi, M. Puglioli, G. Lazzarotti, G. Orlandi, F. Marconi, G. Parenti, and C. Bartolozzi
Silent Cerebral Ischemia Detected With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients Treated With Protected and Unprotected Carotid Artery Stenting
Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2389 - 2393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. I. Paraskevas, S. S. Daskalopoulou, M. E. Daskalopoulos, and C. D. Liapis
Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease. What Is the Evidence?
Angiology, September 1, 2005; 56(5): 539 - 552.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H. G. Roh, H. S. Byun, J. W. Ryoo, D. G. Na, W.-J. Moon, B. B. Lee, and D.-I. Kim
Prospective Analysis of Cerebral Infarction After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stent Placement by Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2005; 26(2): 376 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
B. E. Cil, E. Akpinar, B. Peynircioglu, and S. Cekirge
Utility of Covered Stents for Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2004; 25(7): 1168 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
H. E. Rodriguez and L. Leon
Current Status of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 111 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. D. Ecker, M. A. Pichelmann, I. Meissner, and F. B. Meyer
Durability of Carotid Endarterectomy
Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2941 - 2944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. D. Barr, J. J. Connors III, D. Sacks, J. C. Wojak, G. J. Becker, J. F. Cardella, B. Chopko, J. E. Dion, A. J. Fox, R. T. Higashida, et al.
Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Performance of Cervical Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Developed by a Collaborative Panel of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 2020 - 2034.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Schillinger, M. Exner, W. Mlekusch, H. Rumpold, R. Ahmadi, S. Sabeti, W. Lang, O. Wagner, and E. Minar
Acute-Phase Response after Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery: Association with 6-month In-Stent Restenosis
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 516 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Kastrup, K. Groschel, H. Krapf, B. R. Brehm, J. Dichgans, and J. B. Schulz
Early Outcome of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting With and Without Cerebral Protection Devices: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 813 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Barth and C. Bassetti
Patient Selection for Carotid Endarterectomy: How Far Is Risk Modeling Applicable to the Individual?
Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 524 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Z. Kaposzta, A. Clifton, J. Molloy, J. F. Martin, and H. S. Markus
S-Nitrosoglutathione Reduces Asymptomatic Embolization After Carotid Angioplasty
Circulation, December 10, 2002; 106(24): 3057 - 3062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Barth, C. Bassetti, J. Berkefeld, and M. Sitzer
Patient Selection for Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting
Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2347 - 2348.
[Full Text] [PDF]