Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2001;32:2088-2092
doi: 10.1161/hs0901.095406
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Georgiadis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Georgiadis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2001;32:2088.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Influence of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Patients With Acute Stroke

D. Georgiadis, MD; S. Schwarz, MD; R. W. Baumgartner, MD; R. Veltkamp, MD S. Schwab, MD

From the Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg (Germany), and Department of Neurology, University of Zurich (Switzerland) (R.W.B.).

Correspondence to D. Georgiadis, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail dimitri_georgiadis{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de

Background and Purpose— We undertook this study to evaluate the influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in patients with acute stroke.

Methods— A total of 20 ventilated patients of a neurological intensive care unit were examined under a protocol entailing variation of PEEP to 4, 8, 12, and 4 mm Hg; mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), ICP, heart rate, and mean velocity of the middle cerebral arteries (Vm MCA) were recorded.

Results— CPP significantly changed depending on the various PEEP levels. No significant differences in remaining parameters were evident. Three distinct reaction patterns of the parameters monitored were observed: (1) All parameters remained stable through the various PEEP levels (15 patients, 40 examinations). (2) Increase in PEEP resulted in a significant decrease of MAP, while Vm MCA remained unchanged, indicating an intact cerebral autoregulation. A slight (statistically insignificant) increase in ICP, which was significantly related to the MAP changes, was evident (7 patients, 16 examinations). (3) Increase in PEEP resulted in a decrease of MAP and Vm MCA; ICP remained unchanged or demonstrated a slight decline (3 patients, 6 examinations).

Conclusions— PEEP increase up to 12 mm Hg does not significantly influence ICP. The observed marked changes in CPP are mediated through the MAP. Thus, PEEP application should be safe, provided that MAP is maintained.


Key Words: stroke, acute • treatment outcome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. F. Hanley
Review of Critical Care and Emergency Approaches to Stroke
Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 362 - 364.
[Full Text] [PDF]