Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2002;33:179-185
doi: 10.1161/hs0102.101224
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bagg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hopman, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bagg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hopman, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Other Ethics and Policy
Right arrow Resource utilization
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2002;33:179.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Effect of Age on Functional Outcomes After Stroke Rehabilitation

Stephen Bagg, MD; Alicia Paris Pombo, MD Wilma Hopman, MA

From the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Queen’s University, St Mary’s of the Lake Hospital Site, and MacKenzie Health Services Research Group, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont, Canada.

Correspondence to Stephen Bagg, MD, Physiatrist, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Queen’s University, St Mary’s of the Lake Hospital Site, 340 Union St, PO Box 3600, Kingston, Ontario K7L 5A2. E-mail baggs{at}pccc.kari.net

Background and Purpose The incidence of stroke and the demand for stroke rehabilitation services continues to increase, and it has been proposed that age be used in combination with severity of stroke to determine type of rehabilitation. It is important to identify the impact of age on functional outcome before embracing a system that limits access to rehabilitation on the basis of age.

Methods This prospective study includes all patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation program for 6 years. Demographic and clinical data were extracted by means of chart review. Functional status at admission and discharge was evaluated by means of the FIMTM instrument. Multivariate regression techniques were used to assess the relationships between age, functional outcome, and other predictive variables. Particular attention was paid to the r2 values to assess the amount of variation accounted for by the predictors.

Results Age alone was a significant predictor of total FIM score and Motor FIM score at discharge, but not FIM change. For both total FIM score and Motor FIM score at discharge, age alone accounted for only 3% of the variation in outcome. For all the models, age explained at the most 1.3% of the variation in functional outcome after adjustment for other factors, such as admission FIM score.

Conclusions The small amount of variation that can be explained by age alone and the questionable clinical relevance of such a small effect suggest that there is no justification to deny patients access to rehabilitation solely because of advanced age.


Key Words: aging • disability evaluation • outcome • rehabilitation • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. I. Dallas, S. Rone-Adams, J. L. Echternach, L. M. Brass, and D. M. Bravata
Dependence in Prestroke Mobility Predicts Adverse Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2298 - 2303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Y. S. Ng, J. Stein, M. Ning, and R. M. Black-Schaffer
Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Functional Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke in Different Vascular Territories
Stroke, August 1, 2007; 38(8): 2309 - 2314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. L Fritz, K. E Light, S. N Clifford, T. S Patterson, A. L Behrman, and S. B Davis
Descriptive Characteristics as Potential Predictors of Outcomes Following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for People After Stroke
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2006; 86(6): 825 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
T. Koyama, K. Matsumoto, T. Okuno, and K. Domen
A new method for predicting functional recovery of stroke patients with hemiplegia: logarithmic modelling
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2005; 19(7): 779 - 789.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. M. Ringman, J. L. Saver, R. F. Woolson, W. R. Clarke, and H. P. Adams
Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort
Neurology, August 10, 2004; 63(3): 468 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Paolucci, G. Antonucci, M. G. Grasso, M. Bragoni, P. Coiro, D. De Angelis, F. R. Fusco, D. Morelli, V. Venturiero, E. Troisi, et al.
Functional Outcome of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients After Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Matched Comparison
Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2861 - 2865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. M. Hopman and J. Verner
Quality of Life During and After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 801 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]