Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2002;33:2417-2420
doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000037647.10414.d2
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilhotra, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Currie, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilhotra, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Currie, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Other Stroke

(Stroke. 2002;33:2417.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Homonymous Visual Field Defects and Stroke in an Older Population

Jagjit Singh Gilhotra, MBBS; Paul Mitchell, MD, PhD; Paul R. Healey, MBBS, FRACO; Robert G. Cumming, MBBS, PhD Jon Currie, MBBS, FRACP

From the Department of Ophthalmology (J.S.G., P.M., P.R.H., J.C.), the University of Sydney (Westmead Hospital), Australia and Save Sight Institute; and Department of Public Health and Community Medicine (R.G.C.), the University of Sydney, Australia.

Correspondence to Paul Mitchell, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, NSW, Australia, 2145. E-mail mitchell{at}bigpond.net.au

Purpose— The objective of the present study was to describe the prevalence of homonymous visual field defects in a defined older urban population and associations with self-reported stroke.

Methods— Homonymous visual field defects were assessed from screening automated visual field tests of both eyes in 3654 persons aged >=49 years who were participating in the Blue Mountains Eye Study. This represented 82.4% of eligible residents from a defined area west of Sydney, Australia. A detailed eye examination was performed, and the medical history was taken. Masked grading of visual fields was used to classify the presence of homonymous visual field defects.

Results— Homonymous visual field defects were found in 25 persons (prevalence 0.8%, 95% CI 0.5% to 1.1%). Stroke history was reported by 194 participants (5.3%, 95% CI 4.6% to 6.1%). A strong relationship was found between homonymous visual field defects and history of stroke, age-, and sex-adjusted odds ratio (OR) 23.4 (95% CI 9.9 to 55.7). Homonymous field defects were present in 8.3% of all persons who reported experiencing a stroke. Among those with homonymous field defects, 52% reported a history of stroke. Only 2 of 10 persons (20%) with homonymous field defects without a history of stroke reported having stopped driving, whereas 6 of 9 (67%) reporting stroke had stopped driving (P=0.07). Increasing age (OR 1.4 per decade, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.8) was significantly associated with homonymous visual field defects, with adjustment for sex, whereas a history of hypertension (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 6.1), diabetes (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.2), and renal impairment (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 8.1) also was associated, with adjustment for age and sex.

Conclusions— This study provides accurate prevalence data for homonymous visual field defects in an older population. About half the participants did not report stroke.


Key Words: blindness • epidemiology • prevalence • stroke assessment • stroke outcome • visual disorders • visual fields




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
A. R. Bowers, K. Keeney, and E. Peli
Community-Based Trial of a Peripheral Prism Visual Field Expansion Device for Hemianopia
Arch Ophthalmol, May 1, 2008; 126(5): 657 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Raninen, S Vanni, L Hyvarinen, and R Nasanen
Temporal sensitivity in a hemianopic visual field can be improved by long-term training using flicker stimulation
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 66 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
S. A. Jones and R. A. Shinton
Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems
Age Ageing, November 1, 2006; 35(6): 560 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
X. Zhang, S. Kedar, M. J. Lynn, N. J. Newman, and V. Biousse
Homonymous hemianopias: Clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases
Neurology, March 28, 2006; 66(6): 906 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]