Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2002;33:2819-2826
Published online before print November 14, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000043074.39077.60
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/12/2819    most recent
01.STR.0000043074.39077.60v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nabavi, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ringelstein, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nabavi, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ringelstein, E. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

(Stroke. 2002;33:2819.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

MOSAIC: Multimodal Stroke Assessment Using Computed Tomography

Novel Diagnostic Approach for the Prediction of Infarction Size and Clinical Outcome

Darius G. Nabavi, MD; Stephan P. Kloska, MD; Eun-Mi Nam, MD; Michael Freund, MD; Christiane G. Gaus, MD; Ernst Klotz, MSc; Walter Heindel, MD E. Bernd Ringelstein, MD

From the Departments of Neurology (D.G.N., E.-M.N., E.B.R.) and Clinical Radiology (S.P.K., M.F., C.G.G., W.H.), University of Münster, Münster, and Siemens, Medical Solutions (E.K.), Forchheim, Germany.

Correspondence to Priv-Doz Darius G. Nabavi, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Str 33, D-48129 Münster, Germany. E-mail nabavi{at}uni-muenster.de

Background and Purpose— With new CT technologies, including CT angiography (CTA), perfusion CT (PCT), and multidetector row technique, this method has regained interest for use in acute stroke assessment. We have developed a score system based on Multimodal Stroke Assessment Using CT (MOSAIC), which was evaluated in this prospective study.

Methods— Forty-four acute stroke patients (mean age, 63.8 years) were enrolled within a mean of 3.0±1.9 hours after symptom onset. The MOSAIC score (0 to 8 points) was generated by results of the 3 sequential CT investigations: (1) presence and amount of early signs of infarction on noncontrast CT (NCCT; 0 to 2 points), (2) stenosis (>50%) or occlusion of the distal internal carotid or middle cerebral artery on CTA (0 to 2 points), and (3) presence and amount of reduced cerebral blood flow on 2 adjacent PCT slices (0 to 4 points). The predictive value of the MOSAIC score was compared with each single CT component with respect to the final size of infarction and the clinical outcome 3 months after stroke by use of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Barthel Index (BI).

Results— Among the CT components, PCT showed the best correlation to infarction size (r=0.75) and clinical outcome (r=0.60 to 0.62) compared with NCCT (r=0.43 to 0.58) and CTA (r=0.47 to 0.71). The MOSAIC score showed consistently higher correlation factors (r=0.67 to 0.78) and higher predictive values (0.73 to 1.0) than all single CT components with respect to outcome measures. A MOSAIC score <4 predicted independence with 89% to 96% likelihood (mRS <=2, BI >=90); a MOSAIC score <5 predicted fair outcome with 96% to 100% likelihood (mRS <=3, BI >=60).

Conclusions— The MOSAIC score based on multidetector row CT technology is superior to NCCT, CTA, and PCT in predicting infarction size and clinical outcome in hyperacute stroke.


Key Words: angiography • brain stem infarction • cerebral blood flow • computed tomography • outcome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Rosenthal, L.H. Schwamm, L. Roccatagliata, S.B. Coutts, A.M. Demchuk, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. Gonzalez, M.D. Hill, E.F. Halpern, and M.H. Lev
Role of Recanalization in Acute Stroke Outcome: Rationale for a CT Angiogram-Based "Benefit of Recanalization" Model
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1471 - 1475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. S. Roach, M. R. Golomb, R. Adams, J. Biller, S. Daniels, G. deVeber, D. Ferriero, B. V. Jones, F. J. Kirkham, R. M. Scott, et al.
Management of Stroke in Infants and Children: A Scientific Statement From a Special Writing Group of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2644 - 2691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
F. Torres-Mozqueda, J. He, I.B. Yeh, L.H. Schwamm, M.H. Lev, P.W. Schaefer, and R.G. Gonzalez
An Acute Ischemic Stroke Classification Instrument That Includes CT or MR Angiography: The Boston Acute Stroke Imaging Scale
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1111 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. C. S. Camargo, K. L. Furie, A. B. Singhal, L. Roccatagliata, M. E. Cunnane, E. F. Halpern, G. J. Harris, W. S. Smith, R. G. Gonzalez, W. J. Koroshetz, et al.
Acute Brain Infarct: Detection and Delineation with CT Angiographic Source Images versus Nonenhanced CT Scans
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 541 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
K W Muir, H M Halbert, T A Baird, M McCormick, and E Teasdale
Visual evaluation of perfusion computed tomography in acute stroke accurately estimates infarct volume and tissue viability
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 77(3): 334 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. de Monye, F. Cademartiri, T. T. de Weert, D. A. M. Siepman, D. W. J. Dippel, and A. van Der Lugt
Sixteen-Detector Row CT Angiography of Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Different Volumes of Contrast Material with and without a Bolus Chaser
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 555 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. B. Coutts, M. H. Lev, M. Eliasziw, L. Roccatagliata, M. D. Hill, L. H. Schwamm, J.H. W. Pexman, W. J. Koroshetz, M. E. Hudon, A. M. Buchan, et al.
ASPECTS on CTA Source Images Versus Unenhanced CT: Added Value in Predicting Final Infarct Extent and Clinical Outcome
Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2472 - 2476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. Kloska, D. G. Nabavi, C. Gaus, E.-M. Nam, E. Klotz, E. B. Ringelstein, and W. Heindel
Acute Stroke Assessment with CT: Do We Need Multimodal Evaluation?
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 79 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Schramm, P. D. Schellinger, E. Klotz, K. Kallenberg, J. B. Fiebach, S. Kulkens, S. Heiland, M. Knauth, and K. Sartor
Comparison of Perfusion Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography Angiography Source Images With Perfusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients With Acute Stroke of Less Than 6 Hours' Duration
Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1652 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
Improved Prediction of Acute Stroke Outcome with Multimodal CT
Journal Watch Neurology, March 7, 2003; 2003(307): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Warach
Stroke Neuroimaging
Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 345 - 347.
[Full Text] [PDF]