doi: 10.1161/hs0202.102367
(Stroke. 2002;33:444.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
The Concept of Patient Motivation
A Qualitative Analysis of Stroke Professionals’ Attitudes
From the Department of Public Health Sciences, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, and Elderly Care Unit, St Thomas’ Hospital (A.R.), London, UK.
Correspondence to Niall Maclean, Department of Public Health Sciences, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, 5th Floor, Capital House, 42 Weston St, London SE1 3QD UK. E-mail niall.maclean{at}balliol.oxford.ac.uk
Background and Purpose— The purpose of this work was to investigate how stroke rehabilitation professionals understand the concept of motivation and the ways that they use this concept in their clinical practice.
Methods— This qualitative study used semistructured, in-depth interviews with the professionals working in the stroke unit of an inner-city teaching hospital in the UK.
Results— Motivation was a frequently used concept and was described as an important determinant of rehabilitation outcome. Motivation was attributed to patients on the basis of their demeanor (proactivity was equated with motivation, passivity with lack of motivation) and their compliance with rehabilitation (compliance was seen as indicative of motivation, noncompliance as a lack of motivation). These criteria were found to have blurred boundaries. The determinants of motivation were located partly in personality factors but also in social factors. Central among the social factors were aspects of the professionals’ own behavior taken to positively and negatively affect motivation. Some professionals reported treating unmotivated patients differently from motivated ones, especially if these unmotivated patients were elderly. Motivation was described as a potentially dangerous label.
Conclusions— Professionals are wary of the concept of motivation yet commonly use it in their clinical practice. The blurred boundaries of the criteria used to identify motivation mean that patients must strike a delicate balance between proactivity and compliance to avoid being categorized as unmotivated. The way the concept of motivation is used in clinical practice might have negative implications for patient care, eg, when reticent yet motivated patients are labeled unmotivated.
Key Words: motivation • professional attitudes • rehabilitation • stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M J Fischer, M Scharloo, J J Abbink, A Thijs-Van, A Rudolphus, L Snoei, J A Weinman, and A A Kaptein Participation and drop-out in pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative analysis of the patient's perspective Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2007; 21(3): 212 - 221. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Dixon, E. W Thornton, and C. A Young Perceptions of self-efficacy and rehabilitation among neurologically disabled adults Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2007; 21(3): 230 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J Page and C. Garner Psychometric evaluation of the Motor Readiness Questionnaire for Stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2005; 19(5): 531 - 537. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. McKevitt, J. Redfern, F. Mold, and C. Wolfe Qualitative Studies of Stroke: A Systematic Review Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1499 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02) Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): e1 - 1. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|