This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gray, W. A. Articles by Reisman, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gray, W. A. Articles by Reisman, M. Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Carotid endarterectomy Angioplasty and Stenting Behavioral Changes and Stroke

(Stroke. 2002;33:1063.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy

A Clinical and Cost Comparison of Revascularization Strategies

William A. Gray, MD; Harvey J. White, Jr, MD; Douglas M. Barrett, MD; George Chandran, MD; Roxann Turner, RN Mark Reisman, MD

From Swedish Heart Institute (W.A.G., M.R.), Seattle, Wash, Heart Hospital of New Mexico (H.J.W.), and Presbyterian Hospital (D.M.B., G.C., R.T.), Albuquerque, NM.

Correspondence to William A. Gray, Swedish Cardiovascular Research, Suite 824, 801 Broadway, Seattle, WA 98122. E-mail williamg{at}swedishheart.org

Background and Purpose— Investigational carotid stenting for extracranial carotid stenosis has demonstrated procedural results approaching those reported with endarterectomy, but with limited cost and long-term data. This study compared the in-hospital outcomes and costs of these 2 revascularization strategies at a single institution and the long-term effectiveness of carotid stenting.

Methods— Data for 136 endarterectomies and 136 carotid stent procedures at a tertiary-care community hospital were obtained. The primary clinical outcome measures were in-hospital major ipsilateral stroke and death. In-hospital direct variable costs and length of stay were the primary economic measures. Information on restenosis and late ipsilateral stroke for the stent group was available at 2-year follow-up.

Results— These nonrandomized groups were similar, but the endarterectomy group had more symptomatic patients (42% versus 31%; P=0.0004), and the stent group had more NASCET-excluded patients (68% versus 35%; P<0.0001). In-hospital major ipsilateral stroke and death occurred more frequently in the surgical group, but the difference was not significant (2.9% versus 0%; P=0.1). Minor ipsilateral strokes were similar (2.2% versus 2.9%; P=NS). Cost ($5409 versus $3417; P<0.0001) and length of stay (3.0 versus 1.4 days; P<0.0001) were significantly greater for the surgical group. In the stent group, 6-month angiographic restenosis was 3.1%, and 2-year ipsilateral major stroke rate was 0%.

Conclusions— In-hospital outcomes with carotid stenting were similar to those with endarterectomy but were achieved in patients with significantly more comorbidities. Cost and resource utilization with stenting were substantially less than those with endarterectomy. At 2 years, carotid stenting appeared not only durable but also effective in stroke prevention.

Key Words: carotid arteries • carotid endarterectomy • costs and cost analysis • outcome • stents

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Kuwabara, S. Matsuda, Y. Imanaka, K. Fushimi, H. Hashimoto, and K. Ishikawa The effect of age and procedure on resource use for patients with cerebrovascular disease J Health Serv Res Policy, January 1, 2008; 13(1): 26 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. O'Hara Commentary Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2006; 18(2): 185 - 187. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. S. Roubin, S. Iyer, A. Halkin, J. Vitek, and C. Brennan Realizing the Potential of Carotid Artery Stenting: Proposed Paradigms for Patient Selection and Procedural Technique Circulation, April 25, 2006; 113(16): 2021 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Mayer Carotid Endarterectomy in Nonagenarians--Invited Critique Arch Surg, July 1, 2005; 140(7): 628 - 628. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Groschel, A. Riecker, J. B. Schulz, U. Ernemann, and A. Kastrup Systematic Review of Early Recurrent Stenosis After Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 367 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Sabeti, M. Schillinger, W. Mlekusch, T. Nachtmann, W. Lang, R. Ahmadi, and E. Minar Contralateral High-Grade Carotid Artery Stenosis or Occlusion Is Not Associated with Increased Risk for Poor Neurologic Outcome after Elective Carotid Stent Placement Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 70 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Ecker, M. A. Pichelmann, I. Meissner, and F. B. Meyer Durability of Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2941 - 2944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Taylor, F. Alcocer, and W. D. Jordan Jr Controversies in Carotid Stenting Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2003; 37(2): 79 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Carotid Stenting Gaining Ground on Endarterectomy Journal Watch Neurology, July 25, 2002; 2002(725): 7 - 7. [Full Text]