doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000018081.33541.E3
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2002;33:1574.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Use of Intravenous Heparin by North American Neurologists
Do the Data Matter?
From the Department of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, Mich.
Correspondence to Seemant Chaturvedi, MD, Department of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Program, Wayne State University, 8C-UHC, 4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201. E-mail Schaturv{at}med.wayne.edu
Background and Purpose— Our aim was to determine current usage patterns of intravenous heparin for patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Methods— A survey was undertaken of 280 neurologists from the United States and 270 neurologists from Canada. Brief vignettes were presented for the following 5 scenarios: stroke in evolution, atrial fibrillation-related stroke (A FIB), vertebrobasilar stroke, carotid territory stroke, and multiple transient ischemic attacks. The effect of medicolegal factors was also ascertained. Statistical comparisons were done with chi-squared testing.
Results— US neurologists were significantly more likely than Canadian neurologists to use intravenous heparin for patients with stroke in evolution (51% versus 33%, P<0.001), vertebrobasilar stroke (30% versus 8%, P<0.001), carotid territory stroke (31% versus 4%, P<0.001), and multiple transient ischemic attacks (47% versus 9%, P<0.001). The vast majority of US and Canadian neurologists would use intravenous heparin for acute stroke patients with A FIB (88% and 84%, respectively). US neurologists more often cited medicolegal factors as a potential influence on the decision-making process than Canadian neurologists (33% versus 10%, P<0.001).
Conclusions— In several clinical scenarios, US neurologists were significantly more likely than Canadian neurologists to use intravenous heparin. Fears regarding medicolegal consequences may partially explain the treatment disparity. Despite the publication of 4 clinical trials, which have not shown any long-term benefit for patients with acute stroke and A FIB (International Stroke Trial, Heparin in Acute Embolic Stroke Trial) or cardioembolic stroke (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment, the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial), both US and Canadian neurologists would use intravenous heparin in large numbers for this condition. Further studies are warranted to investigate the lack of impact of "negative" studies on clinician behavior.
Key Words: heparin • heparin, low-molecular-weight • heparinoids • jurisprudence • stroke, acute ischemic
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  H. P. Adams Jr, G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, R. T. Higashida, E. C. Jauch, C. Kidwell, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Circulation, May 22, 2007; 115(20): e478 - e534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. P. Adams Jr, G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, R. T. Higashida, E. C. Jauch, C. Kidwell, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1655 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Sandercock Immediate Anticoagulation for Acute Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: No Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 3054 - 3055. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. O'Donnell, E. Berge, and P. M. Sandset Are There Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation That Benefit From Low Molecular Weight Heparin? Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 452 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Adams, R. Adams, G. Del Zoppo, and L. B. Goldstein Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Ischemic Stroke: 2005 Guidelines Update A Scientific Statement From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 916 - 923. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Benatar Heparin use in acute ischaemic stroke: does evidence change practice? QJM, February 1, 2005; 98(2): 147 - 152. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. M. Demaerschalk Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Education in Cerebrovascular Disease Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 392 - 396. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Grips, M. Daffertshofer, M. Hennerici, and H. P. Adams Jr Banning Anticoagulation in Stroke or Consequence of Poor Study Design Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34 (4): 837 - 839. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Antithrombotics in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Practice Survey and New Guidelines Journal Watch Neurology, September 6, 2002; 2002(906): 1 - 1. [Full Text]
|
|