doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000020711.38824.E3
(Stroke. 2002;33:2060.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Telephone Intervention With Family Caregivers of Stroke Survivors After Rehabilitation
From the University of Alabama School of Nursing (J.S.G., M.W., J.N.G.) and Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (T.R.E.) and Biostatistics (A.A.B.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Correspondence to Joan S. Grant, DSN, RN, CS, University of Alabama School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, NB 407, 1530 3rd Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35294-0113. E-mail grantj{at}admin..son.uab.edu
Background and Purpose— Social problem-solving therapy shows promise as an intervention to improve the well-being of family caregivers. There is some evidence that training in problem solving may be effectively delivered by telephone. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of social problem-solving telephone partnerships on primary family caregiver outcomes after stroke survivors are discharged home from a rehabilitation facility.
Methods— Using a randomized 3-group repeated-measures experimental design, 74 stroke survivors with an admitting diagnosis of ischemic stroke and their primary family caregivers were entered into the study. The intervention consisted of an initial 3-hour home visit between a trained nurse and the family caregiver within 1 week after discharge to begin problem-solving skill training. This initial session was followed by weekly (the first month) and biweekly (the second and third month) telephone contacts.
Results— Compared with the sham intervention and control groups, family caregivers who participated in the social problem-solving telephone partnership intervention group had better problem-solving skills; greater caregiver preparedness; less depression; and significant improvement in measures of vitality, social functioning, mental health, and role limitations related to emotional problems. There were no significant differences among the groups in caregiver burden. Satisfaction with healthcare services decreased over time in the control group while remaining comparable in the intervention and sham intervention groups.
Conclusion— These results indicate that problem-solving training may be useful for family caregivers of stroke survivors after discharge from rehabilitative facilities.
Key Words: caregivers • problem solving • rehabilitation • stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. K. Bambara, C. Owsley, V. Wadley, R. Martin, C. Porter, and L. E. Dreer Family Caregiver Social Problem-Solving Abilities and Adjustment to Caring for a Relative with Vision Loss Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 1585 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Franzen-Dahlin, J. Larson, V. Murray, R. Wredling, and E. Billing A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of a support and education programme for spouses of people affected by stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 722 - 730. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Brereton, C. Carroll, and S. Barnston Interventions for adult family carers of people who have had a stroke: a systematic review Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2007; 21(10): 867 - 884. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Lee, K. Soeken, and S. J. Picot A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Informal Stroke Caregivers West J Nurs Res, April 1, 2007; 29(3): 344 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Redfern, C. McKevitt, and C. D.A. Wolfe Development of Complex Interventions in Stroke Care: A Systematic Review Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2410 - 2419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Mallen, D. L. Vogel, A. B. Rochlen, and S. X Day Online Counseling: Reviewing the Literature From a Counseling Psychology Framework The Counseling Psychologist, November 1, 2005; 33(6): 819 - 871. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. H.L. Lui, F. M. Ross, and D. R. Thompson Supporting Family Caregivers in Stroke Care: A Review of the Evidence for Problem Solving Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2514 - 2522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Salfi, J. Ploeg, and M. E. Black Seeking to Understand Telephone Support for Dementia Caregivers West J Nurs Res, October 1, 2005; 27(6): 701 - 721. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Robinson, J. Francis, P. James, N. Tindle, K. Greenwell, and H. Rodgers Caring for carers of people with stroke: developing a complex intervention following the Medical Research Council framework Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2005; 19(5): 560 - 571. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J M A. Visser-Meily, M. W M Post, I. I Riphagen, and E. Lindeman Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 601 - 623. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Handschu, R. Littmann, U. Reulbach, C. Gaul, J. G. Heckmann, B. Neundorfer, and M. Scibor Telemedicine in Emergency Evaluation of Acute Stroke: Interrater Agreement in Remote Video Examination With a Novel Multimedia System Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2842 - 2846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (25 Oct 02 to 17 Jan 03) Evid. Based Nurs., April 1, 2003; 6(2): e1 - 7. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Teasell Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 365 - 366. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. H. Friedman and J. S. Grant Re: Telephone Intervention With Family Caregivers of Stroke Survivors After Rehabilitation Stroke, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 7 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|