This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/1/127    most recent 01.STR.0000044165.41303.50v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Other Stroke Treatment - Medical Epidemiology Other Stroke

(Stroke. 2003;34:127.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Performance of a Statistical Model to Predict Stroke Outcome in the Context of a Large, Simple, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Feeding

The FOOD Trial Collaboration

Correspondence to Dr Martin Dennis, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland. E-mail msd{at}skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Statistical models to predict the outcome of stroke patients have several uses. Their utility depends on their predictive accuracy in patients other than those on whom they were developed (ie, external validity). We sought to test the external validity of some recently described models in patients enrolled in the FOOD (Feed Or Ordinary Diet) trial: a large randomized trial evaluating feeding policies in patients with stroke.

Methods— The predictive variables were collected during a telephone call to randomize the patient a median of 5 days after stroke onset. Patients were followed up 6 months later to establish their survival, functional status, and residence. Charts were plotted to demonstrate the discrimination and calibration of the models.

Results— The models performed well in the first 2955 patients enrolled and followed up in the FOOD trial. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves varied between 0.78 and 0.81 (with 0.5 indicating no discrimination and 1.0 indicating perfect discrimination). The discrimination was marginally better for patients enrolled within the first day of stroke than later. The models tended to provide rather pessimistic predictions in all groups except those predicted to have a high likelihood of surviving free of dependency.

Conclusions— As one might predict, the discriminatory power in the selected cohort of trial patients was marginally less good than in previously studied unselected cohorts used to test their external validity. These models provide a well-tested tool for stratification in trials, comparing outcomes in different cohorts and examining the additional predictive power of novel factors.

Key Words: cerebrovascular disorders • outcome • prognosis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. R. Konig, A. Ziegler, E. Bluhmki, W. Hacke, P. M.W. Bath, R. L. Sacco, H. C. Diener, C. Weimar, and on behalf of the Virtual International Stroke Tria Predicting Long-Term Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Simple Index Works in Patients From Controlled Clinical Trials Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1821 - 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Dennis Predictions Models in Acute Stroke: Potential Uses and Limitations Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1665 - 1666. [Full Text] [PDF]

				SCOPE (Stroke Complications and Outcomes Predictio Predicting outcome in hyper-acute stroke: validation of a prognostic model in the Third International Stroke Trial (IST3) J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2008; 79(4): 397 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J M Reid, G J Gubitz, D Dai, Y Reidy, C Christian, C Counsell, M Dennis, and S J Phillips External validation of a six simple variable model of stroke outcome and verification in hyper-acute stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 78(12): 1390 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U G R Schulz Predicting functional outcome in acute stroke--prognostic models and clinical judgement J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2004; 75(3): 351 - 352. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Counsell, M Dennis, and M McDowall Predicting functional outcome in acute stroke: comparison of a simple six variable model with other predictive systems and informal clinical prediction J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2004; 75(3): 401 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				German Stroke Study Collaboration Predicting outcome after acute ischemic stroke: An external validation of prognostic models Neurology, February 24, 2004; 62(4): 581 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S C Lewis and C P Warlow How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2004; 75(2): 181 - 187. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Rudd and D. B. Matchar Health Policy and Outcome Research in Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 397 - 400. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Molina, A. V. Alexandrov, A. M. Demchuk, M. Saqqur, K. Uchino, and J. Alvarez-Sabin Improving the Predictive Accuracy of Recanalization on Stroke Outcome in Patients Treated With Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 151 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				FOOD Trial Collaboration Poor Nutritional Status on Admission Predicts Poor Outcomes After Stroke: Observational Data From the FOOD Trial Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1450 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N U Weir, C E Counsell, M McDowall, A Gunkel, and M S Dennis Reliability of the variables in a new set of models that predict outcome after stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2003; 74(4): 447 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]