This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/11/2593    most recent 01.STR.0000097491.82104.F3v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gregson, B. A. Articles by Mendelow, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gregson, B. A. Articles by Mendelow, A. D. Related Collections Intracerebral Hemorrhage Other Stroke Treatment - Surgical

(Stroke. 2003;34:2593.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

International Variations in Surgical Practice for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Barbara A. Gregson, PhD A. David Mendelow, PhD for the STICH Investigators

From the Affiliation University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Correspondence Dr B.A. Gregson, STICH Office Ward 31 (North Wing), Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 6BE UK. E-mail barbara.gregson{at}ncl.ac.uk or stich{at}ncl.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage is a major cause of death and disability, yet there is no convincing evidence of the benefit of any medical treatment and the role of surgery remains controversial. The international randomized Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (STICH) provided an opportunity to assess the role of surgery within the centers taking part.

Methods— Screening logs were completed to record details of all patients assessed by the department, whether they were included in the trial, the reasons if they were not included, and whether they underwent surgery.

Results— Logs were returned by 42 centers and cover 704 months. They include details on 1578 patients with characteristics comparable to STICH inclusion criteria. Neurosurgeons were more likely to express clinical certainty about treatment for older patients, patients with a higher Glasgow Coma Score scale, and patients in whom the hematoma was located on the right or in the basal ganglia or thalamus. Patients for whom the neurosurgeon was certain about treatment were more likely to have the hematoma removed if they were younger (62 versus 68 years of age), had a lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (10 versus 13), and had a lobar hematoma (49% versus 40%). The operation rate varied between 74% in Lithuania and 2% in Hungary.

Conclusions— The difference in operation rates could not be explained by differences in patient characteristics alone. This finding demonstrates the need for further evidence to ensure that treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage is not governed by local custom.

Key Words: intracranial hemorrhages • multicenter studies • physician’s practice patterns • surgery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Prasad, A. D. Mendelow, and B. Gregson Surgery for Primary Supratentorial Intracerebral Hematoma: A Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): e624 - e626. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Davalos and M. Fisher Emerging Therapies for Cerebrovascular Disorders Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 208 - 210. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. F. Hanley and W. Hacke Critical Care and Emergency Medicine Neurology Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 365 - 366. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Macdonald Advances in Vascular Surgery Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 375 - 380. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Minerva BMJ, December 13, 2003; 327(7428): 1414 - 1414. [Full Text] [PDF]