Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2003;34:2636-2640
Published online before print October 30, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000092123.00938.83
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/11/2636    most recent
01.STR.0000092123.00938.83v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leary, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Saver, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leary, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Saver, J. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*CT Scans
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke

(Stroke. 2003;34:2636.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Validation of Computed Tomographic Middle Cerebral Artery Dot Sign

An Angiographic Correlation Study

Megan C. Leary, MD; Chelsea S. Kidwell, MD; J. Pablo Villablanca, MD; Sidney Starkman, MD; Reza Jahan, MD; Gary R. Duckwiler, MD; Y. Pierre Gobin, MD; Steven Sykes, BS; Kristi J. Gough, BA; Katrina Ferguson, BA; Jennifer N. Llanes, BS; Rinat Masamed, BS; Margaret Tremwel, MD, PhD; Bruce Ovbiagele, MD; Paul M. Vespa, MD; Fernando Vinuela, MD Jeffrey L. Saver, MD

From the Department of Neurology, Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass (M.C.L.); Stroke Center (C.S.K., S. Starkman, R.J., G.R.D., S. Sykes, K.J.G., K.F., J.N.L., R.M., M.T., B.O., P.M.V., F.V., J.L.S.) and Departments of Neurology (C.S.K., S. Starkman, K.J.G., K.F., J.N.L., R.M., M.T., B.O., J.L.S.), Neuroradiology (J.P.V., R.J., G.R.D., F.V.), Emergency Medicine (S. Starkman), and Neurosurgery (P.M.V.), University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center; and Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (P.G., P.M.V.).

Reprint requests to Megan C. Leary, MD, Department of Neurology, Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Palmer 125, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail mleary{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

Background and Purpose— The middle cerebral artery (MCA) dot sign consists of hyperdensity of an arterial structure, seen as a dot in the sylvian fissure. The MCA dot sign has been proposed to indicate thrombosis of M2 or M3 MCA branches, analogous to the hyperdense middle cerebral artery (HMCA) sign indicating M1 thrombosis. The MCA dot sign has not been validated previously against the gold standard of conventional cerebral angiography.

Methods— Noncontrast CT scans and immediately subsequent cerebral angiograms from 54 acute stroke patients within 8 hours of symptom onset were analyzed. CT films were inspected for the MCA dot sign and HMCA sign. Vascular findings on CT were compared with findings at angiography.

Results— Mean patient age was 71 years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 16.5. Mean time from symptom onset to CT was 125 minutes, and that from CT to angiography was 117 minutes. All patients had arterial occlusion at angiography. Of the anterior circulation occlusions, M1 occlusions were noted in 28 patients, isolated M2 in 15, and isolated M3 in 4. One definite MCA dot sign was observed in 16.7% of patients, and an HMCA sign was observed in 13.9%. MCA dot sign performance in predicting the presence of M2 or M3 clot at angiography was as follows: sensitivity 38%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 68%, and overall accuracy 73%.

Conclusions— The MCA dot sign is a highly specific and moderately sensitive indicator of acute thrombus in the M2/M3 MCA branches, as validated by catheter angiography. The MCA dot sign is a useful additional acute stroke CT marker.


Key Words: cerebral angiography • infarction, middle cerebral artery • middle cerebral artery • radiography, interventional • stroke, acute




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
O. Ozdemir, A. Leung, M. Bussiere, V. Hachinski, and D. Pelz
Hyperdense Internal Carotid Artery Sign: A CT Sign of Acute Ischemia
Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 2011 - 2016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.Y. Kim, E. Yoo, H.Y. Choi, J.W. Lee, and J.H. Heo
Thrombus Volume Comparison between Patients with and without Hyperattenuated Artery Sign on CT
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 359 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. K. Shetty
The MCA Dot Sign
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 315 - 318.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Mandava and T. A. Kent
Reversal of Dense Signs Predicts Recovery in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2490 - 2492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. M. Demaerschalk
Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Education in Cerebrovascular Disease
Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 392 - 396.
[Full Text] [PDF]