This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/11/2687    most recent 01.STR.0000095189.21659.4Fv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fjærtoft, H. Articles by Lydersen, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fjærtoft, H. Articles by Lydersen, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Home Care Services Stroke Related Collections Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2003;34:2687.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Stroke Unit Care Combined With Early Supported Discharge

Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

From the Department of Neuroscience and Motion (H.F., B.I.), Department of Community Medicine and General Practice (H.F.), and Unit for Applied Clinical Research (S.L.), Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; and Stroke Unit, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Trondheim (H.F., B.I.), Trondheim, Norway.

Correspondence to Hild Fjærtoft, PhD, Department of Neuroscience and Motion, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. E-mail hild.fjartoft{at}medisin.ntnu.no

Background and Purpose— Early supported discharge from a stroke unit reduces the length of hospital stay. Evidence of a benefit for the patients is still unknown. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the long-term effects of an extended stroke unit service (ESUS), characterized by early supported discharge. The short-term effects were published previously.

Methods— We performed a randomized controlled trial in which 320 acute stroke patients were allocated to either ordinary stroke unit service (OSUS) (160 patients) or stroke unit care with early supported discharge (160 patients). The ESUS consists of a mobile team that coordinates early supported discharge and further rehabilitation. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were independent as assessed by modified Rankin Scale (RS) (RS 2=global independence). Secondary outcomes measured at 52 weeks were performance on the Barthel Index (BI) (BI 95=independent in activities of daily living), differences in final residence, and analyses to identify patients who benefited most from an early supported discharge service. All assessments were blinded.

Results— We found that 56.3% of the patients in the ESUS versus 45.0% in the OSUS were independent (RS 2) (P=0.045). The number needed to treat to achieve 1 independent patient in ESUS versus OSUS was 9. The odds ratio for independence was 1.56 (95% CI, 1.01 to 2.44). There were no significant differences in BI score and final residence. Patients with moderate to severe stroke benefited most from the ESUS.

Conclusions— Stroke service based on treatment in a stroke unit combined with early supported discharge appears to improve the long-term clinical outcome compared with ordinary stroke unit care. Patients with moderate to severe stroke benefit most.

Key Words: clinical trials • home care services • stroke management • outcome

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Bernhardt, N. Chitravas, I. L. Meslo, A. G. Thrift, and B. Indredavik Not All Stroke Units Are the Same: A Comparison of Physical Activity Patterns in Melbourne, Australia, and Trondheim, Norway Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 2059 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Bjorkdahl, A{d.}s. L. Nilsson, G. Grimby, and K. S. Sunnerhagen Does a short period of rehabilitation in the home setting facilitate functioning after stroke? A randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2006; 20(12): 1038 - 1049. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Fjaertoft, B. Indredavik, R. Johnsen, and S. Lydersen Acute stroke unit care combined with early supported discharge. Long-term effects on quality of life. A randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2004; 18(5): 580 - 586. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Other articles noted: 14 Nov 2003 to 30 Jan 2004 Evid. Based Nurs., April 1, 2004; 7(2): e2 - e2. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. Teasell and L. Kalra What's New in Stroke Rehabilitation Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 383 - 385. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Rudd and D. B. Matchar Health Policy and Outcome Research in Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 397 - 400. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Langhorne Editorial Comment--Early Supported Discharge: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2691 - 2692. [Full Text] [PDF]