This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/2/488    most recent 01.STR.0000054162.94998.C0v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lai, S.-M. Articles by Bode, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lai, S.-M. Articles by Bode, R. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Family Issues Stroke Related Collections Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke Cerebrovascular disease/stroke Rehabilitation, Stroke Epidemiology

(Stroke. 2003;34:488.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Physical and Social Functioning After Stroke

Comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36

From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Center on Aging, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas (S.-M.L., S.P.); Brooks Center for Rehabilitation Studies, University of Florida, and North Florida/South Georgia Department of Veteran Affairs, Gainesville, Fla (P.W.D.); and Rehabilitation Services Evaluation Unit, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill (R.B.).

Correspondence to Sue-Min Lai, MS, MBA, PhD, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160-7313. E-mail slai{at}kumc.edu

Background and Purpose— This study evaluated assessments of physical functioning and social functioning using the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) to characterize health-related quality of life for patients after stroke.

Methods— The SIS and SF-36 were administered to 278 stroke subjects 90 days after stroke. The SIS-16 and SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) domain characterize physical function, whereas the SIS Participation and SF-36 Social Functioning (SF) domains characterize social function. Descriptive statistics and an analysis of variance were used to characterize physical and social functioning after stroke across levels of the modified Rankin Scale (MRS). Rasch analysis was used to compare the hierarchies and ranges of item difficulties in the SIS-16 and the SF-36 PF domains, as well as in the SIS Participation and the SF-36 SF domains.

Results— Item hierarchies for the SIS-16 and SF-36 PF domain demonstrate that the SIS-16 contains less difficult items that could differentiate physical function among patients with more severe limitations. Compared with the SF-36 SF domain, the item hierarchy for the SIS Participation domain contained more difficult items that could differentiate social function among patients who were more active. In contrast to SIS-16, the SF-36 PF has major floor effects. In contrast to SIS Participation, the SF-36 SF domain has major ceiling effects. Both SIS-16 and SF-36 PF were able to discriminate well among the MRS levels of 0 to 1, 2, 3, and 4. The SIS Participation domain was also able to discriminate across the MRS levels of 0 to 1, 2, and 3 to 4. On the other hand, the SF-36 SF was similar among MRS levels 0, 1, and 2 and among MRS levels 2, 3, and 4.

Conclusions— Both the physical and participation subscales of the SIS cover a wider range of item difficulty than their counterparts from the SF-36. Compared with the SF-36 PF and SF domains, the SIS-16 and SIS Participation are better able to capture physical functioning and social well-being in patients with strokes.

Key Words: outcome • quality of life • stroke • stroke assessment

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. A. Schmid, P. W. Duncan, S. Studenski, and L. Richards Response to Letter by Lord and Rochester Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): e76 - e76. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J Sullivan, D. A Brown, T. Klassen, S. Mulroy, T. Ge, S. P Azen, C. J Winstein, and for the Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network Effects of Task-Specific Locomotor and Strength Training in Adults Who Were Ambulatory After Stroke: Results of the STEPS Randomized Clinical Trial Physical Therapy, December 1, 2007; 87(12): 1580 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J Sullivan Invited Commentary on the Movement Continuum Special Series Physical Therapy, July 1, 2007; 87(7): 928 - 930. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Banks and C. A. Marotta Outcomes Validity and Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale: Implications for Stroke Clinical Trials: A Literature Review and Synthesis Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 1091 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Ruttmann, J. Willeit, H. Ulmer, O. Chevtchik, D. Hofer, W. Poewe, G. Laufer, and L. C. Muller Neurological Outcome of Septic Cardioembolic Stroke After Infective Endocarditis Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2094 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Kapral, J. Fang, M. D. Hill, F. Silver, J. Richards, C. Jaigobin, A. M. Cheung, and for the Investigators of the Registry of the Canad Sex Differences in Stroke Care and Outcomes: Results From the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 809 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.-C. Jonsson, I. Lindgren, B. Hallstrom, B. Norrving, and A. Lindgren Determinants of Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I-P. Hsueh, W.-C. Wang, C.-F. Sheu, and C.-L. Hsieh Rasch Analysis of Combining Two Indices to Assess Comprehensive ADL Function in Stroke Patients Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 721 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]