This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/3/801    most recent 01.STR.0000057978.15397.6Fv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hopman, W. M. Articles by Verner, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hopman, W. M. Articles by Verner, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke Rehabilitation, Stroke Other Stroke

(Stroke. 2003;34:801.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Research Reports

Quality of Life During and After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation

From the Clinical Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, and the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University (W.M.H.), and the Social Services Department, St Mary’s of the Lake Hospital Site, Providence Continuing Care Centre (J.V.), Kingston, Ontario.

Reprint requests to Wilma Hopman, MA, Research Facilitator, Clinical Research Unit, Douglas 5, Room 8-524C, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7. E-mail hopmanw{at}kgh.kari.net

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Very limited longitudinal data are available that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of stroke survivors after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. The purpose of this research was to assess changes in HRQOL during inpatient rehabilitation and again 6 months after discharge.

Methods— This was a prospective study of all eligible patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation hospital over a 3-year period. HRQOL was assessed by means of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36). Dependent t tests were used to compare the scores at admission and discharge and at discharge and 6 months. Changes in HRQOL were calculated for the period of admission to discharge and of discharge to the 6-month follow-up.

Results— Complete data were available for 85 patients. During rehabilitation, there were improvements in all 8 domains of the SF-36, with 5 attaining statistical significance. After discharge, 3 domains continued to improve, with 1 attaining statistical significance. However, there were marked and statistically significant declines in the other 5 domains of the SF-36. Feedback was obtained from a subset of the patients as to the reasons for these declines.

Conclusions— Substantial gains in HRQOL during inpatient stroke rehabilitation may be followed by equally substantial declines in the 6 months after discharge. There is a need for longitudinal research into the HRQOL of stroke survivors and their families, as well as a need to ensure that adequate community services and support are available.

Key Words: outcome • quality of life • rehabilitation • stroke • stroke assessment

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. J. Gray, N. Sprigg, P. M.W. Bath, G. Boysen, P. P. De Deyn, D. Leys, D. O'Neill, E. B. Ringelstein, and for the TAIST Investigators Sex Differences in Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors: Data From the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial (TAIST) Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2960 - 2964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ewert and G. Stucki Validity of the SS-QOL in Germany and in Survivors of Hemorrhagic or Ischemic Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 161 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Xie, E. Q. Wu, Z.-J. Zheng, J. B. Croft, K. J. Greenlund, G. A. Mensah, and D. R. Labarthe Impact of Stroke on Health-Related Quality of Life in the Noninstitutionalized Population in the United States Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2567 - 2572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Torp, S. Vinkler, K. D. Pedersen, F. R. Hansen, T. Jorgensen, and J. Olsen Model of Hospital-Supported Discharge After Stroke Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1514 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Nichols-Larsen, P.C. Clark, A. Zeringue, A. Greenspan, and S. Blanton Factors Influencing Stroke Survivors' Quality of Life During Subacute Recovery Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1480 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.-C. Jonsson, I. Lindgren, B. Hallstrom, B. Norrving, and A. Lindgren Determinants of Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Minerva BMJ, October 6, 2003; 327(7418): E225 - 225. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Padua, P. Caliandro, P. Tonali, I. Caruso, I. Aprile, and W. Hopman Quality of Life During and After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation * Response Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34 (10): e180 - e181. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Minerva BMJ, March 22, 2003; 326(7390): 668 - 668. [Full Text] [PDF]