Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2003;34:1404-1409
Published online before print May 8, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000072520.53106.8C
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/6/1404    most recent
01.STR.0000072520.53106.8Cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tejada, J.
Right arrow Articles by Balboa, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tejada, J.
Right arrow Articles by Balboa, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebral Lacunes

(Stroke. 2003;34:1404.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Does a Relationship Exist Between Carotid Stenosis and Lacunar Infarction?

J. Tejada, MD, PhD; E. Díez-Tejedor, MD, PhD; L. Hernández-Echebarría, MD O. Balboa, MD

From the Division of Neurology (J.T., L.H.-E.) and Department of Radiology (O.B.), Hospital de León, León, and Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario "La Paz," Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid (E.D.-T.), Spain

Correspondence to Dr Javier Tejada García, Division of Neurology, Hospital de León, 24008 León, Spain. E-mail jtejada{at}hleo.insalud.es

Background and Purpose— The presence of carotid stenosis (CS) in a patient with lacunar stroke is usually considered an indication of atherosclerosis and not directly related to the development of this infarction subtype. This study was designed to determine the relationship between CS and lacunar infarction (LI) and to assess the differences between single and multiple LIs.

Methods— We classified 330 patients with a first-ever cerebral infarction in the carotid territory into LI and non-LI (NLI) groups. In the LI group, patients with a single LI and those with multiple LIs were identified. In this last subgroup, 2 patterns were identified: 1 subtype with lacunar lesions distributed in both cerebral hemispheres, and another with lesions predominantly in 1 hemisphere.

Results— In the LI group, isolated CS was significantly more frequent on the homolateral side than on the contralateral side (odds ratio [OR], 5.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 23; P=0.03). A significant relationship between the pattern of distribution of the infarctions in only 1 hemisphere and homolateral CS >70% was observed (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 0.9 to 19; P=0.03). In a multivariate analysis, the following variables were found to predict unilateral multiple LI: left ventricular hypertrophy (OR, 9.1; 95% CI, 2.5 to 33.6) and homolateral CS >75% (OR, 14.4; 95% CI, 2.0 to 99.6).

Conclusions— The significant incidence of isolated ipsilateral CS in patients with LI located in the carotid territory and the relationship of CS to ipsilateral multiple LI suggest that CS has a very important role in the development of LI.


Key Words: carotid stenosis • lacunar infarction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. Yamada, Y. Nagakane, H. Sasajima, M. Nakagawa, K. Mineura, T. Masunami, K. Akazawa, and T. Nishimura
Incidental Acute Infarcts Identified on Diffusion-Weighted Images: A University Hospital-Based Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 937 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. S. Markus, U. Khan, J. Birns, A. Evans, L. Kalra, A. G. Rudd, C. D.A. Wolfe, and P. Jerrard-Dunne
Differences in Stroke Subtypes Between Black and White Patients With Stroke: The South London Ethnicity and Stroke Study
Circulation, November 6, 2007; 116(19): 2157 - 2164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
T Seifert, C Enzinger, M K Storch, G Pichler, K Niederkorn, and F Fazekas
Acute small subcortical infarctions on diffusion weighted MRI: clinical presentation and aetiology
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2005; 76(11): 1520 - 1524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J M Wardlaw
What causes lacunar stroke?
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2005; 76(5): 617 - 619.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
D Chowdhury, J M Wardlaw, and M S Dennis
Are multiple acute small subcortical infarctions caused by embolic mechanisms?
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2004; 75(10): 1416 - 1420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Norrving
Lacunar Infarction: Embolism is the Key: Against
Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1779 - 1780.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. H. Lee, S. -H. Oh, O. Y. Bang, S. -Y. Joo, I. S. Joo, and K. Huh
Infarct patterns in atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery versus internal carotid artery disease
Neurology, April 27, 2004; 62(8): 1291 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Devuyst and J. Bogousslavsky
Editorial Comment: The Fall and Rise of Lacunar Infarction With Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1409 - 1411.
[Full Text] [PDF]