| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:2356.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (K.A., H.M., K.T., Y.I.) and Drug Development and Clinical Evaluation (T.O., M.K., J.H.), Environmental Health Sciences (H.S.), Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science and Medicine, Sendai; and Ohasama Hospital, Iwate (H.H.), Japan.
Correspondence to Dr Yutaka Imai, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science and Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan. E-mail imai{at}tinet-i.ne.jp
Background and Purpose To compare the predictive power of self-measured home blood pressure (HBP) and casual blood pressure (CBP) for stroke risk in relation to the Joint National Committee 7 (JNC-7) classification.
Methods HBP and CBP measurements were taken in 1702 subjects (
40 years) without a history of stroke, who were followed up for an average of 11 years. Subjects were classified into 4 groups on the basis of either HBP or CBP, according to the JNC-7 criteria: group 1 (HBP <115/75 mm Hg; CBP <120/80 mm Hg); group 2 (115/75
HBP<135/85 mm Hg; 120/80
CBP<140/90 mm Hg); group 3 (135/85
HBP<150/95 mm Hg; 140/90
CBP<160/100 mm Hg); and group 4 (HBP
150/95 mm Hg; CBP
160/100 mm Hg). Groups 2, 3, and 4 were further divided into 2 subgroups (a and b): those without and with cardiovascular disease risks, respectively. The risk of the first stroke in these groups was examined by the Cox hazards model adjusted for age and sex.
Results The stroke risk in groups 3b and 4b (defined by HBP and CBP) was 2 to 5x higher than that in group 1 with significant differences. The risk in groups 2a, 3a, and even 4a was not significantly different from that in group 1 by the CBP-based classification, but the risk in group 4a was significantly higher than that in group 1 by the HBP-based classification, which also showed a stepwise increase in risk from groups 2a to 4a.
Conclusions The JNC-7 classification had a stronger predictive power using HBP-based classification compared with CBP-based classification, suggesting the usefulness of HBP in the management of hypertension.
Key Words: blood pressure hypertension prospective studies stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Greiver Improving hypertension management in my practice Can Fam Physician, March 1, 2008; 54(3): 358 - 359. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Asayama, T. Ohkubo, M. Kikuya, T. Obara, H. Metoki, R. Inoue, A. Hara, T. Hirose, H. Hoshi, J. Hashimoto, et al. Prediction of Stroke by Home "Morning" Versus "Evening" Blood Pressure Values: The Ohasama Study Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 737 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Asayama, T. Ohkubo, M. Kikuya, H. Metoki, T. Obara, H. Hoshi, J. Hashimoto, K. Totsune, H. Satoh, and Y. Imai Use of 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for predicting stroke using self-measured blood pressure at home: the Ohasama study Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 2026 - 2031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rudd Self measured home blood pressure was better than "clinic" blood pressure for predicting stroke in a Japanese population Evid. Based Med., June 1, 2005; 10(3): 92 - 92. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |