Published online before print October 7, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:2529.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Progress Review |
Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke
A Meta-Analysis
From the Department of Physical Therapy and Research Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences (G.K., R.v.P.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; the Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine "De Hoogstraat" (G.K.), Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands; the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Center for Neurorehabilitation (R.C.W.), Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Mass; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.W.D.), School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; the Department of Rehabilitation and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (C.R.), Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec; the School of Health Professions and Rehabilitation Sciences (A.A.), University of Southampton, UK; the School for Physiotherapy (K.M.), University of Melbourne, Australia; the School of Psychology (N.L.), University of Nottingham, UK; the Centre for Health Services Studies (C.P.), University of Kent at Canterbury, UK; and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (I.W., P.L.), Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.
Correspondence to Dr G. Kwakkel, Department Physical Therapy, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail g.kwakkel{at}vumc.nl
Background and Purpose— To present a systematic review of studies that addresses the effects of intensity of augmented exercise therapy time (AETT) on activities of daily living (ADL), walking, and dexterity in patients with stroke.
Summary of Review— A database of articles published from 1966 to November 2003 was compiled from MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, DARE, and PiCarta using combinations of the following key words: stroke, cerebrovascular disorders, physical therapy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, exercise therapy, rehabilitation, intensity, dose–response relationship, effectiveness, and randomized controlled trial. References presented in relevant publications were examined as well as abstracts in proceedings. Studies that satisfied the following selection criteria were included: (1) patients had a diagnosis of stroke; (2) effects of intensity of exercise training were investigated; and (3) design of the study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). For each outcome measure, the estimated effect size (ES) and the summary effect size (SES) expressed in standard deviation units (SDU) were calculated for ADL, walking speed, and dexterity using fixed and random effect models. Correlation coefficients were calculated between observed individual effect sizes on ADL of each study, additional time spent on exercise training, and methodological quality. Cumulative meta-analyses (random effects model) adjusted for the difference in treatment intensity in each study was used for the trials evaluating the effects of AETT provided. Twenty of the 31 candidate studies, involving 2686 stroke patients, were included in the synthesis. The methodological quality ranged from 2 to 10 out of the maximum score of 14 points. The meta-analysis resulted in a small but statistically significant SES with regard to ADL measured at the end of the intervention phase. Further analysis showed a significant homogeneous SES for 17 studies that investigated effects of increased exercise intensity within the first 6 months after stroke. No significant SES was observed for the 3 studies conducted in the chronic phase. Cumulative meta-analysis strongly suggests that at least a 16-hour difference in treatment time between experimental and control groups provided in the first 6 months after stroke is needed to obtain significant differences in ADL. A significant SES supporting a higher intensity was also observed for instrumental ADL and walking speed, whereas no significant SES was found for dexterity.
Conclusion— The results of the present research synthesis support the hypothesis that augmented exercise therapy has a small but favorable effect on ADL, particularly if therapy input is augmented at least 16 hours within the first 6 months after stroke. This meta-analysis also suggests that clinically relevant treatment effects may be achieved on instrumental ADL and gait speed.
Key Words: activities of daily living • cerebrovascular disorders • exercise • meta-analysis • occupational therapy • physical therapy • rehabilitation
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  P. Bagley, M. Hudson, J. Green, A. Forster, and J. Young Do physiotherapy staff record treatment time accurately? An observational study Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2009; 23(9): 841 - 845. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Platz, S. van Kaick, J. Mehrholz, O. Leidner, C. Eickhof, and M. Pohl Best Conventional Therapy Versus Modular Impairment-Oriented Training for Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Single-Blind, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 706 - 716. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Wevers, I. van de Port, M. Vermue, G. Mead, and G. Kwakkel Effects of Task-Oriented Circuit Class Training on Walking Competency After Stroke: A Systematic Review Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2450 - 2459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Housman, K. M. Scott, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 505 - 514. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M. Hammer and B. Lindmark Author Response Physical Therapy, June 1, 2009; 89(6): 541 - 542. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Harris, J. J. Eng, W. C. Miller, and A. S. Dawson A Self-Administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) Improves Arm Function During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial Stroke, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 2123 - 2128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Castel-Lacanal, P. Marque, J. Tardy, X. de Boissezon, V. Guiraud, F. Chollet, I. Loubinoux, and M. Simonetta-Moreau Induction of Cortical Plastic Changes in Wrist Muscles by Paired Associative Stimulation in the Recovery Phase of Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 366 - 372. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Donaldson, R. Tallis, S. Miller, A. Sunderland, R. Lemon, and V. Pomeroy Effects of Conventional Physical Therapy and Functional Strength Training on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Phase II Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 389 - 397. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Dunning, K. Black, A. Harrison, K. McBride, and S. Israel Neuroprosthesis Peroneal Functional Electrical Stimulation in the Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting: A Case Series Physical Therapy, May 1, 2009; 89(5): 499 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Verheyden, L. Vereeck, S. Truijen, M. Troch, C. LaFosse, W. Saeys, E. Leenaerts, A. Palinckx, and W. De Weerdt Additional Exercises Improve Trunk Performance After Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 281 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Mirelman, P. Bonato, and J. E. Deutsch Effects of Training With a Robot-Virtual Reality System Compared With a Robot Alone on the Gait of Individuals After Stroke Stroke, January 1, 2009; 40(1): 169 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 649 - 660. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Crotty, L. C. Giles, J. Halbert, J. Harding, and M. Miller Home versus day rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial Age Ageing, November 1, 2008; 37(6): 628 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. N. Byl, E. A. Pitsch, and G. M. Abrams Functional Outcomes Can Vary by Dose: Learning-Based Sensorimotor Training for Patients Stable Poststroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2008; 22(5): 494 - 504. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Braun, M. Kleynen, J. Schols, T. Schack, A. Beurskens, and D. Wade Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a framework Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 579 - 591. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Britton, N. Harris, and A. Turton An exploratory randomized controlled trial of assisted practice for improving sit-to-stand in stroke patients in the hospital setting Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 458 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Meilink, B. Hemmen, H. Seelen, and G. Kwakkel Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: a systematic review of the literature Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 291 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Loubinoux, S. Dechaumont-Palacin, E. Castel-Lacanal, X. De Boissezon, P. Marque, J. Pariente, J.-F. Albucher, I. Berry, and F. Chollet Prognostic Value of fMRI in Recovery of Hand Function in Subcortical Stroke Patients Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2007; 17(12): 2980 - 2987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J Sullivan, D. A Brown, T. Klassen, S. Mulroy, T. Ge, S. P Azen, C. J Winstein, and for the Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network Effects of Task-Specific Locomotor and Strength Training in Adults Who Were Ambulatory After Stroke: Results of the STEPS Randomized Clinical Trial Physical Therapy, December 1, 2007; 87(12): 1580 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. C. Gotzsche, A. Hrobjartsson, K. Maric, and B. Tendal Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences JAMA, July 25, 2007; 298(4): 430 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. De Wit, K. Putman, B. Schuback, A. Komarek, F. Angst, I. Baert, P. Berman, K. Bogaerts, N. Brinkmann, L. Connell, et al. Motor and Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Comparison of 4 European Rehabilitation Centers Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2101 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Brandt Motor and Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Comparison Between 4 European Rehabilitation Centers Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2030 - 2031. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Putman, L. De Wit, M. Schoonacker, I. Baert, H. Beyens, N. Brinkmann, E. Dejaeger, A.-M. De Meyer, W. De Weerdt, H. Feys, et al. Effect of socioeconomic status on functional and motor recovery after stroke: a European multicentre study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2007; 78(6): 593 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. H. Dobkin Interpreting the Randomized Clinical Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Arch Neurol, March 1, 2007; 64(3): 336 - 338. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Nieuwboer, G Kwakkel, L Rochester, D Jones, E van Wegen, A M Willems, F Chavret, V Hetherington, K Baker, and I Lim Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: the RESCUE trial J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2007; 78(2): 134 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. H. Dobkin Behavioral, Temporal, and Spatial Targets for Cellular Transplants as Adjuncts to Rehabilitation for Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 832 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Young and A. Forster Review of stroke rehabilitation BMJ, January 13, 2007; 334(7584): 86 - 90. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. H. Dobkin Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Mastos, K Miller, A C Eliasson, and C Imms Goal-directed training: linking theories of treatment to clinical practice for improved functional activities in daily life Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 47 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Schenkman, J. E Deutsch, and K. M Gill-Body An Integrated Framework for Decision Making in Neurologic Physical Therapist Practice Physical Therapy, December 1, 2006; 86(12): 1681 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. G.L. van de Port, G. Kwakkel, I. van Wijk, and E. Lindeman Susceptibility to Deterioration of Mobility Long-Term After Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 167 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. H. Dobkin Rehabilitation and Functional Neuroimaging Dose-Response Trajectories for Clinical Trials Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2005; 19(4): 276 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. De Wit, K. Putman, E. Dejaeger, I. Baert, P. Berman, K. Bogaerts, N. Brinkmann, L. Connell, H. Feys, W. Jenni, et al. Use of Time by Stroke Patients: A Comparison of Four European Rehabilitation Centers Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): 1977 - 1983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Platz, C Eickhof, S van Kaick, U Engel, C Pinkowski, S Kalok, and M Pause Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2005; 19(7): 714 - 724. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. H. Dobkin Rehabilitation after Stroke N. Engl. J. Med., April 21, 2005; 352(16): 1677 - 1684. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. W. Teasell and L. Kalra What's New in Stroke Rehabilitation: Back to Basics Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 215 - 217. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|