| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:2699.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Neurology Stroke Program (J.C.G., E.A.N., J.A.), University of TexasHouston Medical School, Houston; the Department of Psychology (T.R.), Rice University, Houston; the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (C.B.), University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston; the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (H.L.), Baylor Medical School, Waco; and the Department of Psychology (T.S.), University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
Correspondence to Dr James C. Grotta, Department of Neurology Stroke Program, University of TexasHouston Medical School, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail james.c.grotta{at}uth.tmc.edu
Constraint-induced movement therapy improves outcome after chronic stroke, conforms experimental observations of neuronal plasticity, and proves the efficacy of intensive occupational therapy. More acutely instituted constraint-induced movement therapy has both practical and theoretic risks and benefits that deserve further careful evaluation.
Key Words: acute care occupational therapy rehabilitation stroke, acute
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. H. Dobkin Rehabilitation after Stroke N. Engl. J. Med., April 21, 2005; 352(16): 1677 - 1684. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |