Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:2702-2705
Published online before print October 14, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143235.93497.03
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/11_suppl_1/2702    most recent
01.STR.0000143235.93497.03v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friehs, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friehs, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, J. P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes

(Stroke. 2004;35:2702.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Brain–Machine and Brain–Computer Interfaces

Gerhard M. Friehs, MD; Vasilios A. Zerris, MD; Catherine L. Ojakangas, PhD; Mathew R. Fellows, BA John P. Donoghue, PhD

From the Departments of Clinical Neuroscience and Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI.

Correspondence to Dr Gerhard M. Friehs, 120 Dudley Street, Providence, RI 02905. E-mail gfriehs{at}yahoo.com

The idea of connecting the human brain to a computer or machine directly is not novel and its potential has been explored in science fiction. With the rapid advances in the areas of information technology, miniaturization and neurosciences there has been a surge of interest in turning fiction into reality. In this paper the authors review the current state-of-the-art of brain–computer and brain–machine interfaces including neuroprostheses. The general principles and requirements to produce a successful connection between human and artificial intelligence are outlined and the authors’ preliminary experience with a prototype brain–computer interface is reported.


Key Words: electroencephalography • receptors, sensory • rehabilitation • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. H. Ehrsson, K. Wiech, N. Weiskopf, R. J. Dolan, and R. E. Passingham
Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response
PNAS, June 5, 2007; 104(23): 9828 - 9833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Martinez, T. Perez, C. R. Mirasso, and E. Manjarrez
Stochastic Resonance in the Motor System: Effects of Noise on the Monosynaptic Reflex Pathway of the Cat Spinal Cord
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4007 - 4016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. Gerloff, K. Bushara, A. Sailer, E. M. Wassermann, R. Chen, T. Matsuoka, D. Waldvogel, G. F. Wittenberg, K. Ishii, L. G. Cohen, et al.
Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke
Brain, March 1, 2006; 129(3): 791 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. C. Cramer, L. Lastra, M. G. Lacourse, and M. J. Cohen
Brain motor system function after chronic, complete spinal cord injury
Brain, December 1, 2005; 128(12): 2941 - 2950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]