This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 35/4/843    most recent 01.STR.0000120309.84666.AEv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, R. Articles by Levine, B. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhang, R. Articles by Levine, B. D. Related Collections Brain Circulation and Metabolism Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2004;35:843.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Cerebral Hemodynamics During the Valsalva Maneuver

Insights From Ganglionic Blockade

From the Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.

Correspondence to Rong Zhang, PhD, Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, 7232 Greenville Ave, Dallas, TX 75231. E-mail RongZhang{at}Texashealth.org

Background and Purpose— The aim of this study was to differentiate the mechanical effects of the Valsalva maneuver (VM) from the effects of changes in autonomic neural activity on cerebral hemodynamics in humans.

Methods— Nine healthy subjects performed the VM before and after autonomic ganglionic blockade with trimethaphan. Blood pressure (BP) was measured in the radial artery with an indwelling catheter or at the finger by Finapres. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) velocity was measured in the middle cerebral artery with transcranial Doppler; end-tidal CO₂ was measured by mass spectrometry.

Results— Before blockade, during phase II of the VM, BP was reduced by 27% and CBF velocity was reduced by 33% (magnitude of changes during phase II divided by baseline measurements before the VM, P<0.05). Cerebrovascular conductance index (CVCI) increased by 21%. During phase IV, overshoot of CBF velocity was proportionately greater than that of BP (46% versus 30%). After blockade, during phase II, BP fell to a much greater degree by 50%, while CBF velocity decreased even more by 60% associated with an increase in CVCI by 33%. During phase IV, despite the absence of BP overshoot, CBF velocity still increased by 55% and CVCI by 33%. Both were significantly greater than before blockade.

Conclusions— After ganglionic blockade, cerebral autoregulation is unable to prevent the substantial fall in CBF induced by the marked reduction in BP during the VM. Enhanced phase IV increases in both CBF velocity and CVCI reflect the intrinsic characteristics of cerebral hyperemic responses, which are likely modified in part by the removal of vasoconstrictor effects of autonomic neural activity elicited during the VM.

Key Words: blood pressure • cerebral blood flow • ultrasonography, Doppler

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. D. Levine, R. Zhang, M. Visocchi, P. N. Ainslie, S. Ogoh, L. Edvinsson, M. Yildiz, O. B. Paulson, G. M. Knudsen, P. A. Cassaglia, et al. Comments on Point:Counterpoint: Sympathetic activity does/does not influence cerebral blood flow J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1369 - 1373. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Prabhakar, Z. Ali, and M. S. Sharma Valsalva's Maneuver to Assist Delivery of a Neurocysticercosis Cyst from the Fourth Ventricle Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 731 - 731. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. V. Immink, B.-J. H. van den Born, G. A. van Montfrans, Y.-S. Kim, M. W. Hollmann, and J. J. van Lieshout Cerebral Hemodynamics During Treatment With Sodium Nitroprusside Versus Labetalol in Malignant Hypertension Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 236 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Fu, N. E. Townsend, S. M. Shiller, E. R. Martini, K. Okazaki, S. Shibata, M. J. Truijens, F. A. Rodriguez, C. J. Gore, J. Stray-Gundersen, et al. Intermittent hypobaric hypoxia exposure does not cause sustained alterations in autonomic control of blood pressure in young athletes Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): R1977 - R1984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ogoh, P. J. Fadel, R. Zhang, C. Selmer, O. Jans, N. H. Secher, and P. B. Raven Middle cerebral artery flow velocity and pulse pressure during dynamic exercise in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1526 - H1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. V. Immink, B.-J. H. van den Born, G. A. van Montfrans, R. P. Koopmans, J. M. Karemaker, and J. J. van Lieshout Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation in Patients With Malignant Hypertension Circulation, October 12, 2004; 110(15): 2241 - 2245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]