This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 35/8/1847    most recent 01.STR.0000133248.71808.38v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wessels, T. Articles by Klötzsch, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wessels, T. Articles by Klötzsch, C. Related Collections Carotid endarterectomy Cerebrovascular disease/stroke Imaging Angiography Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2004;35:1847.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Extracranial Doppler Sonography in Carotid Artery Stenosis Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography

Tiemo Wessels, MD; Judith U. Harrer, MD; Susanne Stetter, MD; Michael Mull, MD Christof Klötzsch, MD

From the Department of Neurology (T.W.), Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany; the Departments of Neurology (T.W., J.H., S.S., C.K.) and Neuroradiology (M.M.), Aachen University Medical School, Aachen, Germany; and the Department of Neurology (C.K.), Kliniken Schmieder Allensbach/Singen, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Tiemo Wessels, Department of Neurology, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Am Steg 14, 35385 Giessen, Germany. E-mail tiemo.wessels{at}neuro.med.uni-giessen.de

Background and Purpose— Difficulties in data presentation, data storage, and a high interobserver variability may influence color-coded Duplex sonography assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS). The aim of our study was to evaluate the between-method agreement of ICAS using 3D color Doppler sonography (CDS) compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods— Forty-nine patients with 64 ICASs (age 64±9 years) were involved. The patients were investigated with a color-coded duplex system using the power mode. The 3D system consists of an electromagnet that induces a low-intensity magnetic field near the patient’s head. A magnetic position sensor is attached to the probe and transmits the spatial orientation to a personal computer.

Results— A total of 62 ICASs were reconstructed successfully with 3D CDS in 47 of 49 patients. High agreement for 2 independent observers was found in 3D CDS (weighted coefficient of 0.88). Three-dimensional CDS slightly underestimated the mean stenotic degree (mean 3D CDS 68.47±10.5 versus DSA 71.3±10.0). The intermethod agreement comparing DSA with 3D CDS was analyzed with the Bland and Altman test, which showed good agreement. Mean sensitivity of 3D CDS was 93%, mean specificity 82.5%, mean positive predictive value 82%, and mean negative predictive value 98%.

Conclusions— The 3D CDS findings demonstrated good agreement compared with the gold standard, DSA, yielding higher accuracy than CDS alone. Compared with angiography or magnetic resonance angiography, 3D CDS can be performed easily on critically ill patients in stroke or intensive care units and may therefore provide a useful tool for patients unable to undergo more invasive imaging techniques.

Key Words: carotid stenosis • ultrasonography, Doppler • cerebrovascular disorders • imaging, three-dimensional