(Stroke. 2004;35:2171.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation (B.F., P.A.J., J.-M.M., M.B.) and ERT-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Imagerie Moléculaire et Fonctionnelle (M.A.), Université de Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux Cedex, France; and the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U455 et Service de Neurologie (D.C., J.-F.D.), CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Correspondence to Dr Bruno Fernandez, Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation, CHU Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France. E-mail b.fernandez{at}tiscali.fr
Background and Purpose The goal of this study was to develop a functional MRI (fMRI) paradigm robust and reproducible enough in healthy subjects to be adapted for a follow-up study aiming at evaluating the anatomical substratum of recovery in poststroke aphasia.
Methods Ten right-handed subjects were studied longitudinally using fMRI (7 of them being scanned twice) and compared with a patient with conduction aphasia during the first year of stroke recovery.
Results Controls exhibited reproducible activation patterns between subjects and between sessions during language tasks. In contrast, the patient exhibited dynamic changes in brain activation pattern, particularly in the phonological task, during the 2 fMRI sessions. At 1 month after stroke, language homotopic right areas were recruited, whereas large perilesional left involvement occurred later (12 months).
Conclusions We first demonstrate intersubject robustness and intrasubject reproducibility of our paradigm in 10 healthy subjects and thus its validity in a patient follow-up study over a stroke recovery time course. Indeed, results suggest a spatiotemporal poststroke brain reorganization involving both hemispheres during the recovery course, with an early implication of a new contralateral functional neural network and a later implication of an ipsilateral one.
Key Words: language magnetic resonance imaging recovery of function stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R M Lazar, A E Speizer, J R Festa, J W Krakauer, and R S Marshall Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 79(5): 530 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Smits, E. Visch-Brink, C. K. Schraa-Tam, P. J. Koudstaal, and A. van der Lugt Functional MR Imaging of Language Processing: An Overview of Easy-to-Implement Paradigms for Patient Care and Clinical Research RadioGraphics, October 1, 2006; 26(suppl_1): S145 - S158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Hillis The right place at the right time? Brain, June 1, 2006; 129(6): 1351 - 1356. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Saur, R. Lange, A. Baumgaertner, V. Schraknepper, K. Willmes, M. Rijntjes, and C. Weiller Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke Brain, June 1, 2006; 129(6): 1371 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Crinion and C. J. Price Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke Brain, December 1, 2005; 128(12): 2858 - 2871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |