This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 36/12/2648    most recent 01.STR.0000189629.10603.02v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liepert, J. Articles by Weiller, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Liepert, J. Articles by Weiller, C. Related Collections Acute Cerebral Infarction

(Stroke. 2005;36:2648.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Motor Strokes

The Lesion Location Determines Motor Excitability Changes

Joachim Liepert, MD; Cordula Restemeyer, MD; Thomas Kucinski, MD; Simone Zittel, MD Cornelius Weiller, MD

From the Departments of Neurology (J.L., C.R., S.Z.) and Neuroradiology (T.K.), University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, and Department of Neurology (C.W.), University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.

Correspondence to Joachim Liepert, MD, University Medical Center Eppendorf Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail liepert{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

Background and Purpose— The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of lesion location on motor excitability and motor performance.

Methods— We studied patients with pure motor strokes in 4 different brain areas: motor cortex lesions (n=7), striatocapsular lesions (n=13), lacunar lesions of the internal capsule (n=13), and paramedian pontine lesions (n=10). Motor performance tests included the 9-hole-peg test and grip strength recordings. Motor excitability was determined by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor thresholds, stimulus-response curves, silent periods, motor cortical inhibition, and facilitation were investigated.

Results— The 4 groups were clinically similar but showed major differences in motor excitability. Only motor cortex lesions had a loss of intracortical inhibition in the affected hemisphere. In the internal capsule lesion group and the pontine lesion group, stimulus-response curves were depressed on the affected side. All of the subcortical lesions showed a prolongation of the silent period in the paretic side. Motor thresholds were predominantly elevated in the lesioned hemisphere of patients with internal capsule or pontine lesions. Motor performance was correlated with silent period duration in internal capsule lesions and with motor thresholds in internal capsule and pontine lesions.

Conclusions— Motor cortex lesions exhibited deficient inhibitory properties. In contrast, subcortical lesions displayed an enhancement of inhibition. Internal capsule and pontine lesions affecting the corticospinal tract on different levels particularly impaired neuronal recruitment. Our results suggest that the lesion location determines a specific pattern of motor excitability changes.

Key Words: cerebral infarction • electromagnetics • evoked potentials, motor

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Castel-Lacanal, P. Marque, J. Tardy, X. de Boissezon, V. Guiraud, F. Chollet, I. Loubinoux, and M. Simonetta-Moreau Induction of Cortical Plastic Changes in Wrist Muscles by Paired Associative Stimulation in the Recovery Phase of Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 366 - 372. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. F Siengsukon and L. A Boyd Does Sleep Promote Motor Learning? Implications for Physical Rehabilitation Physical Therapy, April 1, 2009; 89(4): 370 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. B.C. Swayne, J. C. Rothwell, N. S. Ward, and R. J. Greenwood Stages of Motor Output Reorganization after Hemispheric Stroke Suggested by Longitudinal Studies of Cortical Physiology Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1909 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. M. Pomeroy, G. Cloud, R. C. Tallis, C. Donaldson, V. Nayak, and S. Miller Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Muscle Contraction to Enhance Stroke Recovery: A Randomized Proof-of-Principle and Feasibility Investigation Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 509 - 517. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. G. Lindberg, P. H. B. Skejo, E. Rounis, Z. Nagy, C. Schmitz, H. Wernegren, A. Bring, M. Engardt, H. Forssberg, and J. Borg Wallerian Degeneration of the Corticofugal Tracts in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study Relating Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, and Hand Function Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 551 - 560. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L Wolf Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1212 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-H. Kim, S. H. You, M.-H. Ko, J.-W. Park, K. H. Lee, S. H. Jang, W.-K. Yoo, and M. Hallett Response to Letter by Hotermans et al Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 254 - 254. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Lefaucheur, X. Drouot, I. Menard-Lefaucheur, Y. Keravel, and J. P. Nguyen Motor cortex rTMS restores defective intracortical inhibition in chronic neuropathic pain. Neurology, November 14, 2006; 67(9): 1568 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-H. Kim, S. H. You, M.-H. Ko, J.-W. Park, K. H. Lee, S. H. Jang, W.-K. Yoo, and M. Hallett Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1471 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]