This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 36/4/762    most recent 01.STR.0000158924.71069.94v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bots, M. L. Articles by Witteman, J. C.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bots, M. L. Articles by Witteman, J. C.M. Related Collections Acute myocardial infarction Epidemiology

(Stroke. 2005;36:762.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction

The Role of Lumen Diameter

From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.L.B., D.E.G.), Univeristy Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (A.H., J.C.M.W), Erasmus Medcal Cente, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Michiel L. Bots, MD, PhD, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, HP Stratenum 6.131, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands. E-mail m.l.bots{at}jc.azu.nl

Background— It has been argued that lumen diameter of the common carotid artery should be taken into account in analyses on common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and cardiovascular risk. Yet, no published report has dealt with this issue in detail.

Methods— In the Rotterdam study baseline ultrasound images of the carotid arteries were made. During follow-up of 8.2 years, 656 new acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) occurred. Regression analysis was used to study myocardial infarction relation to right (or left) common CIMT with various adjustments for right-, or left-sided lumen diameter. Lumen adjustment was made by (1) a simple adjustment in a regression equation; (2) using the CIMT-to-lumen ratio; (3) using arterial mass, calculated as ({x[(lumen+near wall CIMT+far wall CIMT)/2]²}–[x(lumen/2)²]).

Results— AMI disease risk increased per standard deviation increase in common CIMT (0.177 mm): hazard ratio (HR) 1.28 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.37). When lumen diameter was taken into account the HR was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.35). The HR for the CIMT-to-lumen ratio was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.27) and for arterial mass 1.28 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.37). Additional analyses indicated that the CIMT-to-lumen ratio at lower CIMT levels appears to reflect arterial remodelling rather than risk of cardiovascular disease.

Conclusion— We conclude that using the CIMT-to-lumen ratio yields the weakest associations. Other approaches for adjustment for common carotid lumen diameter do not affect the magnitude or precision of the association of common CIMT to risk of AMI. When the interest is in risk relations the preference goes to either CIMT or arterial mass measurement.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • cardiovascular disease • risk assessment • risk factors

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Puato, P. Palatini, M. Zanardo, F. Dorigatti, C. Tirrito, M. Rattazzi, and P. Pauletto Increase in Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Grade I Hypertensive Subjects: White-Coat Versus Sustained Hypertension Hypertension, May 1, 2008; 51(5): 1300 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]