Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2005;36:891-901
Published online before print March 10, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000157949.34986.30
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/4/891    most recent
01.STR.0000157949.34986.30v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sudlow, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sudlow, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Cerebral Lacunes
Right arrow Risk Factors for Stroke
Right arrowRelated Articles

(Stroke. 2005;36:891.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Progress Reviews

Are Lacunar Strokes Really Different?

A Systematic Review of Differences in Risk Factor Profiles Between Lacunar and Nonlacunar Infarcts

Caroline Jackson, BSc Cathie Sudlow, DPhil, MRCP

From the Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Correspondence to Dr Cathie Sudlow, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK EH4 2XU. E-mail cathie.sudlow{at}ed.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Differences in risk factors between lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts might support a distinct arterial pathological process underlying lacunar infarction.

Methods— We did a systematic review of studies comparing risk factors in patients with lacunar versus nonlacunar infarction. For each risk factor, we calculated study-specific and pooled relative risks (RRs) for lacunar versus nonlacunar infarction.

Results— A total of 16 of 28 studies included risk factors in their ischemic stroke subtype definitions. Hypertension and diabetes appeared commoner among patients with lacunar versus nonlacunar infarction. However, analyses confined to studies using risk factor–free ischemic subtype definitions found only a marginal excess of hypertension with lacunar versus nonlacunar infarction (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.19) and no difference for diabetes (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.09). Atrial fibrillation and carotid stenosis were associated more with nonlacunar than lacunar infarction but less so when only studies using risk factor–free classifications were considered. Otherwise, there was no evidence of differences in risk factor profiles.

Conclusions— Risk factor–free ischemic stroke subtype classification methods should be used for comparing risk factor profiles between lacunar and nonlacunar subtypes.


Key Words: lacunar infarction • meta-analysis • risk factors • stroke


Related Articles:

Editorial Comment— Time to Burn the TOAST
William M. Landau and Abdullah Nassief
Stroke 2005 36: 902-904. [Full Text] [PDF]

Time to Burn the TOAST
William M. Landau and Abdullah Nassief
Stroke 2005 0: 01.STR.0000157952.38759.e4v1. [Abstract] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
Y Bejot, M Caillier, D Ben Salem, G Couvreur, O Rouaud, G-V Osseby, J Durier, C Marie, T Moreau, and M Giroud
Ischaemic stroke subtypes and associated risk factors: a French population based study
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2008; 79(12): 1344 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PNHome page
B Norrving
Lacunar infarcts: no black holes in the brain are benign
Practical Neurology, August 1, 2008; 8(4): 222 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Y. Bejot, A. Catteau, M. Caillier, O. Rouaud, J. Durier, C. Marie, A. Di Carlo, G.-V. Osseby, T. Moreau, and M. Giroud
Trends in Incidence, Risk Factors, and Survival in Symptomatic Lacunar Stroke in Dijon, France, From 1989 to 2006: A Population-Based Study
Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 1945 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
K Park, N Yasuda, S Toyonaga, E Tsubosaki, H Nakabayashi, and K Shimizu
Significant associations of metabolic syndrome and its components with silent lacunar infarction in middle aged subjects
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2008; 79(6): 719 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
U. Khan, L. Porteous, A. Hassan, and H. S Markus
Risk factor profile of cerebral small vessel disease and its subtypes
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 78(7): 702 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
J. A. Viehman, J. L. Saver, D. S. Liebeskind, S. Starkman, L. K. Ali, B. Buck, T. Razinia, and B. Ovbiagele
Utility of Urinalysis in Discriminating Cardioembolic Stroke Mechanism
Arch Neurol, May 1, 2007; 64(5): 667 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. M. O. Pruissen, S. A.M. Gerritsen, T. J. Prinsen, J. M. Dijk, L. J. Kappelle, A. Algra, and on behalf of the SMART Study Group
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Is Different in Large- and Small-Vessel Ischemic Stroke: The SMART Study
Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1371 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. K. Liem, J. van der Grond, J. Haan, R. van den Boom, M. D. Ferrari, Y. M. Knaap, M. H. Breuning, M. A. van Buchem, H. A.M. Middelkoop, and S. A.J. Lesnik Oberstein
Lacunar Infarcts Are the Main Correlate With Cognitive Dysfunction in CADASIL
Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 923 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. L. Labovitz, B. Boden-Albala, W. A. Hauser, and R. L. Sacco
Lacunar infarct or deep intracerebral hemorrhage: Who gets which? The Northern Manhattan Study
Neurology, February 20, 2007; 68(8): 606 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. Ohira, E. Shahar, L. E. Chambless, W. D. Rosamond, T. H. Mosley Jr, and A. R. Folsom
Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke Subtypes: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2493 - 2498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. M. Wardlaw, S. C. Lewis, S. L. Keir, M. S. Dennis, and S. Shenkin
Cerebral Microbleeds Are Associated With Lacunar Stroke Defined Clinically and Radiologically, Independently of White Matter Lesions
Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2633 - 2636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. M. Dijk, Y. van der Graaf, M. L. Bots, D. E. Grobbee, A. Algra, and on behalf of the SMART study group
Carotid intima-media thickness and the risk of new vascular events in patients with manifest atherosclerotic disease: the SMART study
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2006; 27(16): 1971 - 1978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. J. Hankey
Potential New Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke: What Is Their Potential?
Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2181 - 2188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. H.A. Halkes, L. J. Kappelle, J. van Gijn, I. van Wijk, P. J. Koudstaal, and A. Algra
Large Subcortical Infarcts: Clinical Features, Risk Factors, and Long-Term Prognosis Compared With Cortical and Small Deep Infarcts
Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1828 - 1832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
E L L M De Schryver, A Algra, R C J M Donders, J van Gijn, and L J Kappelle
Type of stroke after transient monocular blindness or retinal infarction of presumed arterial origin
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2006; 77(6): 734 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. Sacco, C. Marini, R. Totaro, T. Russo, D. Cerone, and A. Carolei
A population-based study of the incidence and prognosis of lacunar stroke
Neurology, May 9, 2006; 66(9): 1335 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M.-J. Ariesen, A. Algra, and L. J. Kappelle
Antiplatelet Drugs In the Secondary Prevention After Stroke: Differential Efficacy in Large Versus Small Vessel Disease? A Subgroup Analysis From ESPS-2
Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 134 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. Jackson and C. Sudlow
Comparing risks of death and recurrent vascular events between lacunar and non-lacunar infarction
Brain, November 1, 2005; 128(11): 2507 - 2517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T.-H. Lee and K.-C. Chang
Editorial Comment--Are We in Another Unavoidable 'Diagnose and Adios' Era?
Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): 1852 - 1853.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. M. Landau and A. Nassief
Editorial Comment-- Time to Burn the TOAST
Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 902 - 904.
[Full Text] [PDF]