| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:1172.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Brain Rehabilitation Research Center (S.L.F., A.L.B., S.B.D.), Gainesville VA Medical Center, Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development (VA RR&D), Gainesville, Fla; the Department of Exercise Science (S.L.F.), University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; University of Florida Department of Physical Therapy (S.L.F., K.E.L., T.S.P., A.L.B.), Gainesville, Fla.
Correspondence to Stacy L. Fritz, PhD, PT, 1300 Wheat St, Blatt PE Bldg, Dept of Exercise Science Columbia, SC 29208. E-mail sfritz{at}gwm.sc.edu
Background and Purpose Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a rehabilitative strategy used primarily with the post-stroke population to increase the functional use of the neurologically weaker upper extremity through massed practice while restraining the lesser involved upper extremity. Whereas research evidence supports CIMT, limited evidence exists regarding the characteristics of individuals who benefit most from this intervention. The goal of this study was to investigate the potential of 5 measures to predict functional CIMT outcomes.
Methods A convenience sample of 55 individuals, >6 months after stroke, was recruited that met specific inclusion/exclusion criteria allowing for individuals whose upper extremity was mildly to severely involved. They participated in CIMT 6 hours per day. Pretest, post-test, and follow-up assessments were performed to assess the outcomes for the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The potential predictors were minimal motor criteria (active extension of the wrist and 3 fingers), active finger extension/grasp release, grip strength, FuglMeyer upper extremity motor score, and the Frenchay score. A step-wise regression analysis was used in which the potential predictors were entered in a linear regression model with simultaneous entry of the dependent variables pretest score as the covariate. Two regressions models were determined for the dependent variable, for immediate post-test, and for follow-up post-test.
Results Finger extension was the only significant predictor of WMFT outcomes.
Conclusions When using finger extension/grasp release as a predictor in the regression equations, one can predict individuals follow-up scores for CIMT. This experiment provides the most comprehensive investigation of predictors of CIMT outcomes to date.
Key Words: motor activity physical therapy rehabilitation stroke outcome
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. E. Lang, S. L. DeJong, and J. A. Beebe Recovery of Thumb and Finger Extension and Its Relation to Grasp Performance After Stroke J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 451 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bogard, S. Wolf, Qin Zhang, P. Thompson, D. Morris, and D. Nichols-Larsen Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be Streamlined? Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 422 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-c. Lin, Y.-h. Huang, Y.-w. Hsieh, and C.-y. Wu Potential Predictors of Motor and Functional Outcomes After Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy for Patients With Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 336 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. de Bode, S. L Fritz, K. Weir-Haynes, and G. W Mathern Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Individuals After Cerebral Hemispherectomy: A Case Series Physical Therapy, April 1, 2009; 89(4): 361 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Dohle, J. Pullen, A. Nakaten, J. Kust, C. Rietz, and H. Karbe Mirror Therapy Promotes Recovery From Severe Hemiparesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 209 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. van Kuijk, J. W. Pasman, H. T. Hendricks, M. J. Zwarts, and A. C. H. Geurts Predicting Hand Motor Recovery in Severe Stroke: The Role of Motor Evoked Potentials in Relation to Early Clinical Assessment Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 45 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-W. Park, S. L. Wolf, S. Blanton, C. Winstein, and D. S. Nichols-Larsen The EXCITE Trial: Predicting a Clinically Meaningful Motor Activity Log Outcome Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2008; 22(5): 486 - 493. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Meilink, B. Hemmen, H. Seelen, and G. Kwakkel Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: a systematic review of the literature Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 291 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, P. C. Clark, and D. Nichols-Larsen Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L Wolf Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1212 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Cramer, T. B. Parrish, R. M. Levy, G. T. Stebbins, S. D. Ruland, D. W. Lowry, T. P. Trouard, S. W. Squire, M. E. Weinand, C. R. Savage, et al. Predicting Functional Gains in a Stroke Trial Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2108 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L Fritz, S. Z George, S. L Wolf, and K. E Light Participant Perception of Recovery as Criterion to Establish Importance of Improvement for Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Outcome Measures: A Preliminary Study Physical Therapy, February 1, 2007; 87(2): 170 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, C. Giuliani, K. E. Light, D. Nichols-Larsen, and for the EXCITE Investigators Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, November 1, 2006; 296(17): 2095 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L Fritz, K. E Light, S. N Clifford, T. S Patterson, A. L Behrman, and S. B Davis Descriptive Characteristics as Potential Predictors of Outcomes Following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for People After Stroke Physical Therapy, June 1, 2006; 86(6): 825 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |