This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 36/6/1178    most recent 01.STR.0000166056.04922.f2v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dick, P. Articles by Schillinger, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dick, P. Articles by Schillinger, M. Related Collections Acute myocardial infarction Epidemiology Other Stroke Secondary prevention Risk Factors Acute Stroke Syndromes Carotid Stenosis

(Stroke. 2005;36:1178.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Gender Differences in Outcome of Conservatively Treated Patients With Asymptomatic High Grade Carotid Stenosis

Petra Dick, MD; Camillo Sherif, MD; Schila Sabeti, MD; Jasmin Amighi, MD; Erich Minar, MD Martin Schillinger, MD

From the Department of Angiology, Medical University Vienna, Austria.

Correspondence to Martin Schillinger, MD, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Angiology, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail martin.schillinger{at}meduniwien.ac.at

Background and Purpose— Gender differences are currently becoming increasingly recognized as an important prognostic factor in patients with atherosclerotic disease. We investigated gender-related differences in vascular outcome and mortality of asymptomatic patients with high-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.

Methods— We enrolled 525 consecutive patients (325 males with a median age of 72 years and 200 females with a median age of 75 years) from a single center registry who were initially treated conservatively with respect to a neurologically asymptomatic 70% ICA stenosis. Patients were followed-up for a median of 38 months (interquartile range, 18 to 65) for major adverse cardiovascular, cerebral, and peripheral vascular events (MACE: combined end point including myocardial infarction, stroke, [partial] limb amputation, and death), vascular mortality, and all-cause mortality.

Results— Cumulative MACE-free survival rates in males and females at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83%, 65%, 48% versus 85%, 73%, and 67% (P=0.004), respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios for MACE, vascular mortality, and all-cause mortality for males were 1.96 (P=0.016), 2.48 (P<0.001), and 1.70 (P=0.007) as compared with females, irrespective of age, vascular risk factors, comorbidities, and the individual risk status estimated by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score.

Conclusion— Male patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis are at a considerably higher risk for poor outcome than their female counterparts. In particular, the risk for fatal vascular events is substantially increased in males.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • carotid arteries • gender • outcome

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. M.B. Goessens, F. L.J. Visseren, L. J. Kappelle, A. Algra, Y. van der Graaf, and for the SMART Study Group Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis and the Risk of New Vascular Events in Patients With Manifest Arterial Disease: The SMART Study Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1470 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Krejza, M. Arkuszewski, S. E. Kasner, J. Weigele, A. Ustymowicz, R. W. Hurst, B. L. Cucchiara, and S. R. Messe Carotid Artery Diameter in Men and Women and the Relation to Body and Neck Size Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1103 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Epstein, P. Dick, and M. Schillinger Gender and Carotid Artery Stenosis * Response: Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 343 - 343. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. E. Hellings, B. A.N. Verhoeven, F. L. Moll, T. V. d. Broek, and G. Pasterkamp Pathophysiology of Gender Difference in Prognosis of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Research and Future Implications Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 332 - 332. [Full Text] [PDF]