This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 36/6/1305    most recent 01.STR.0000166202.00669.d2v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shaughnessy, M. Articles by Macko, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shaughnessy, M. Articles by Macko, R. F. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2005;36:1305.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Research Reports

Steps After Stroke

Capturing Ambulatory Recovery

Marianne Shaughnessy, PhD, CRNP; Kathleen M. Michael, PhD, RN; John D. Sorkin, MD, PhD Richard F. Macko, MD

From the Baltimore VA Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC; M.S., K.M.M., J.D.S., R.F.M.), Maryland; University of Maryland School of Nursing (M.S.), Baltimore; and University of Maryland School of Medicine (K.M.M., J.D.S., R.F.M.), Baltimore.

Correspondence to Marianne Shaughnessy, PhD, CRNP, Baltimore VA GRECC, 10 N Greene St, (BT/18/GR), Baltimore, MD 21201. E-mail mshaughn{at}grecc.umaryland.edu

Background and Purpose— Nearly two thirds of stroke survivors have deficits impairing ambulatory recovery. Conventional mobility outcome measures such as timed walks and functional independence measure (FIM) do not quantify free-living ambulatory behavior. This study compared step activity monitoring (SAM) with established instruments to assess ambulatory recovery across the outpatient subacute stroke rehabilitation phase.

Methods— We measured FIM mobility subscale, SAM-derived daily steps, Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) mobility scores, and timed walks in 11 subjects after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and again 3 months later.

Results— Significant improvement was measured in free-living step activity (mean gain 80%; P=0.001) but not with timed walks (P=0.4), FIM (P=0.08), or SIS mobility scales (P=0.3).

Conclusions— Microprocessor-linked SAM is a sensitive indicator of ambulatory recovery that measures improvements not captured by other conventional outcome instruments.

Key Words: outcome • stroke

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. F. Ditunno Jr, H. Barbeau, B. H. Dobkin, R. Elashoff, S. Harkema, R. J. Marino, W. W. Hauck, D. Apple, D. M. Basso, A. Behrman, et al. Validity of the Walking Scale for Spinal Cord Injury and Other Domains of Function in a Multicenter Clinical Trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 539 - 550. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Plummer, A. L. Behrman, P. W. Duncan, P. Spigel, D. Saracino, J. Martin, E. Fox, M. Thigpen, and S. A. Kautz Effects of Stroke Severity and Training Duration on Locomotor Recovery After Stroke: A Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 137 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M E Busse, C M Wiles, and R W M van Deursen Community walking activity in neurological disorders with leg weakness. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 77(3): 359 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]