| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:1457.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Medicine (Rehabilitation; S.E.L.), Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington South, New Zealand; and the School of Health (L.R.), Community and Education Studies, Northumbria University, Coach Lane, Benton, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Correspondence to Susan E. Lord, Dept of Medicine (Rehabilitation), Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington South. E-mail: sue.lord{at}ts.co.nz
Background and Purpose This report considers the measurement of community ambulation for people with stroke. The conceptual issues underlying measurement of community ambulation are reviewed, and tests that measure either the task itself or at least some of its components are identified and discussed.
Conclusions The findings from this review suggest that although some progress has been made toward identifying community ambulation as a stand-alone entity, reliable and valid measures have not yet been developed. Gait speed, which is used often as a proxy measure for community ambulation, does not consistently reflect the level of community ambulation attained, and continued reliance on its use, particularly the 10-m timed walk, is misplaced. The limitations of the measures reviewed here point toward self-report as being the most useful outcome for current clinical use. However, this report highlights the need for research to first inform a theoretical framework for the measurement of community ambulation, from which a measurement tool or a battery of measurements can be developed and tested.
Key Words: ambulation community gait mobility stroke, acute
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Donovan, S. E Lord, H. K McNaughton, and M. Weatherall Mobility beyond the clinic: the effect of environment on gait and its measurement in community-ambulant stroke survivors Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 556 - 563. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Hornby, D. D. Campbell, J. H. Kahn, T. Demott, J. L. Moore, and H. R. Roth Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1786 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Schmid, P. W. Duncan, S. Studenski, and L. Richards Response to Letter by Lord and Rochester Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): e76 - e76. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lord, K. M McPherson, H. K McNaughton, L. Rochester, and M. Weatherall How feasible is the attainment of community ambulation after stroke? A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate community-based physiotherapy in subacute stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2008; 22(3): 215 - 225. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schmid, P. W. Duncan, S. Studenski, S. M. Lai, L. Richards, S. Perera, and S. S. Wu Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2096 - 2100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |