This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 36/8/1759    most recent 01.STR.0000174487.81126.efv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Winhuisen, L. Articles by Heiss, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Winhuisen, L. Articles by Heiss, W. D.

(Stroke. 2005;36:1759.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Role of the Contralateral Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Recovery of Language Function in Poststroke Aphasia

A Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Positron Emission Tomography Study

Lutz Winhuisen, MD; Alexander Thiel, MD; Birgit Schumacher; Josef Kessler, PhD; Jobst Rudolf, MD; Walter F. Haupt, MD Wolf D. Heiss, MD

From the Department of Neurology (L.W., A.T., B.S., W.F.H., W.D.H.), University of Cologne, Germany; and the Max-Planck-Institute for Neurological Research (L.W., A.T., B.S., J.K., J.R., W.D.H.), Köln Germany.

Correspondence to Lutz Winhuisen, MD, Max-Planck-Institute for Neurological Research, Gleueler Str. 50, D-50866 Köln, Germany. E-mail L.Winhuisen{at}pet.mpin-koeln.mpg.de

Background and Purpose— Functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) activation in poststroke aphasia. It remains unclear whether this activation is essential for language performance. We tested this hypothesis in a positron emission tomography (PET) activation study during a semantic task with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on right-handed patients experiencing poststroke aphasia and examined whether rTMS stimulation over the right and left IFG would interfere with language performance.

Methods— Eleven patients with left-sided middle cerebral arterial infarction, 50 to 75 years of age, were tested with the Aachen Aphasia Test Battery and underwent ¹⁵O-H₂O PET activation during a semantic task within 2 weeks after stroke. PET activation images were coregistered to T1-weighted MRIs. Stimulation sites were determined on renderings of head and brain over the maximum activation within left and right IFG. rTMS was performed with 20% maximum output (2.1 T), 10-s train duration, at 4Hz frequency. A positive rTMS effect was defined as an increased reaction time latency or error rate in the semantic task.

Results— PET activations of the IFG were observed on the left (3 patients) and bilaterally (8 patients). Right IFG stimulation was positive in 5 patients with right IFG activation, indicating essential language function. In a verbal fluency task, these patients had a lower performance than patients without right-sided TMS effect.

Conclusions— In some poststroke aphasics, right IFG activation is essential for residual language function. However, its compensatory potential seems to be less effective than in patients who recover left IFG function. These results suggest a hierarchy in recovery from poststroke aphasia and a (limited) compensatory potential of the nondominant hemisphere.

Key Words: aphasia • recovery of function • tomography, emission computed

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Richter, W. H. R. Miltner, and T. Straube Association between therapy outcome and right-hemispheric activation in chronic aphasia Brain, May 1, 2008; 131(5): 1391 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Carmichael Themes and Strategies for Studying the Biology of Stroke Recovery in the Poststroke Epoch Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1380 - 1388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Raymer, P. Beeson, A. Holland, D. Kendall, L. M. Maher, N. Martin, L. Murray, M. Rose, C. K. Thompson, L. Turkstra, et al. Translational Research in Aphasia: From Neuroscience to Neurorehabilitation J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2008; 51(1): S259 - S275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Xue, A. R. Aron, and R. A. Poldrack Common Neural Substrates for Inhibition of Spoken and Manual Responses Cereb Cortex, January 31, 2008; (2008) bhm220v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Winhuisen, A. Thiel, B. Schumacher, J. Kessler, J. Rudolf, W. F. Haupt, and W. D. Heiss The Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Poststroke Aphasia: A Follow-Up Investigation Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1286 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Devlin and K. E. Watkins Stimulating language: insights from TMS Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 610 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Saur, R. Lange, A. Baumgaertner, V. Schraknepper, K. Willmes, M. Rijntjes, and C. Weiller Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke Brain, June 1, 2006; 129(6): 1371 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Gerloff, K. Bushara, A. Sailer, E. M. Wassermann, R. Chen, T. Matsuoka, D. Waldvogel, G. F. Wittenberg, K. Ishii, L. G. Cohen, et al. Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke Brain, March 1, 2006; 129(3): 791 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.-D. Heiss and R. W. Teasel Brain Recovery and Rehabilitation Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 314 - 316. [Full Text] [PDF]