| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:1764.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Division of Geriatric Medicine (S.S., S.P.), University of Pittsburgh, Pa; GRECC (S.S.), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pa; Department of Health Services Research (P.W.D.), Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville; Brooks Center for Rehabilitation Studies (P.W.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville; North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (P.W.D., L.R.), Gainesville Department of Health Policy and Administration (D.R.), University of Kansas; Kansas City VA Medical Center (D.R.), Kansas; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (S.M.L.), University of Kansas, Kansas City; and Department of Occupational Therapy (L.R.), University of Florida, Gainesville.
Correspondence to Stephanie Studenski, MD, MPH, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 500, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail sas33{at}pitt.edu
Background and Purpose The ability of therapeutic exercise after stroke to improve daily functioning and quality of life (QOL) remains controversial. We examined treatment effects on these outcomes in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of exercise in subacute stroke survivors.
Methods This is a secondary analysis of a single-blind RCT of a 12-week program versus usual care. Baseline, post-treatment and 6-month post-treatment daily functioning and QOL were assessed by Barthel index, Functional Independence Measure, instrumental activities of daily living, Medical Outcomes Study short-form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS).
Results Of 100 randomized subjects, 93 completed the postintervention assessment, (mean age 70; 54% male; 81% white; mean Orpington Prognostic Score 3.4), and 80 had 6-month post-treatment assessment. Immediately after intervention, the intervention group improved more than usual care in SF-36 social function (14.0 points; P=0.0051) and in SIS (strength [9.2 points; P=0.0003], emotion [5.6 points; P=0.0240], social participation [6.6 points; P=0.0488], and physical function [5.0 points; P=0.0145]). Treatment was marginally more effective on Barthel score (3.3 points; P=0.0510), SF-36 (physical function [6.8 points; P=0.0586], physical role function [14.4 points; P=0.0708]), and SIS upper extremity function (7.2 points; P=0.0790). Effects were diluted 6 months after treatment ended.
Conclusion This rehabilitation exercise program led to more rapid improvement in aspects of physical, social, and role function than usual care in persons with subacute stroke. Adherence interventions to promote continued exercise after treatment might be needed to continue benefit.
Key Words: disability exercise quality of life rehabilitation stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Stuart, F. Benvenuti, R. Macko, A. Taviani, L. Segenni, F. Mayer, J. D. Sorkin, S. J. Stanhope, V. Macellari, and M. Weinrich Community-Based Adaptive Physical Activity Program for Chronic Stroke: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of the Empoli Model Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 726 - 734. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-c. Lin, Y.-h. Huang, Y.-w. Hsieh, and C.-y. Wu Potential Predictors of Motor and Functional Outcomes After Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy for Patients With Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 336 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lorenzen and L. L. Murray Benefits of Physical Fitness Training in Healthy Aging and Neurogenic Patient Populations Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, October 1, 2008; 18(3): 99 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Brandt Motor and Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Comparison Between 4 European Rehabilitation Centers Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2030 - 2031. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, C. Giuliani, K. E. Light, D. Nichols-Larsen, and for the EXCITE Investigators Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, November 1, 2006; 296(17): 2095 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Blanton, D. M Morris, M. G Prettyman, K. McCulloch, S. Redmond, K. E Light, and S. L Wolf Lessons Learned in Participant Recruitment and Retention: The EXCITE Trial Physical Therapy, November 1, 2006; 86(11): 1520 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |