Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2006;37:2573-2551
Published online before print September 7, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000241086.92084.c0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v38,p206)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/10/2573    most recent
01.STR.0000241086.92084.c0v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heuschmann, P. U.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heuschmann, P. U.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, K.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research

(Stroke. 2006;37:2573.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Development and Implementation of Evidence-Based Indicators for Measuring Quality of Acute Stroke Care

The Quality Indicator Board of the German Stroke Registers Study Group (ADSR)

Peter U. Heuschmann, MD, MPH; Marcel K. Biegler, MD; Otto Busse, MD; Susanne Elsner, MD; Armin Grau, MD; Uwe Hasenbein, MSc; Peter Hermanek, MD; Rudolf W.C. Janzen, MD; Peter L. Kolominsky-Rabas, MD; Klaus Kraywinkel, MD, MSc; Klaus Lowitzsch, MD; Bjoern Misselwitz, MD, MPH; Darius G. Nabavi, MD; Kirsten Otten, MD, MPH; Ludger Pientka, MD; Gerhard M. von Reutern, MD; Erich Bernd Ringelstein, MD; Dirk Sander, MD; Markus Wagner, PhD Klaus Berger, MD, MPH

From the Coordination Office and Central Data Centre of the ADSR, Stroke Register Northwest-Germany (P.U.H., K.B.), Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine (P.U.H., K.B., K.K.), University of Muenster, Stroke Register Rhineland-Palatinate (M.K.B., A.G., K.L.), Regional Office for Quality Assurance Rhineland-Palatinate (M.K.B.), SQMed gGmbH, Mainz, Department of Neurology (A.G., K.L.), Klinikum Ludwigshafen; German Stroke Society (O.B., E.B.R.), Commission "Stroke Units and Acute Stroke Treatment" of the German Stroke Society (E.B.R.), Department of Neurology (E.B.R., D.G.N.), University of Muenster, Commission "Health Care Research" of the German Stroke Society (P.K.R.), Unit for Stroke Research and Public Health Medicine (P.K.R.), University of Erlangen-Nuremberg; German Society of Neurology (O.B.), Minden, Commission "Quality Management" of the German Society of Neurology (R.W.C.J.), Frankfurt; Stroke Register Baden-Wuerttemberg (S.E.), Regional Office for Quality Assurance Baden-Wuerttemberg (GeQik), Stuttgart; Institute for Neurological-Neurosurgical Rehabilitation Research (U.H.), University of Magdeburg; Stroke Register Bavaria (P.H.), Regional Office for Quality Assurance Bavaria (BAQ), Munich; Stroke Register Hesse (B.M., G.M.v.R., R.W.C.J.), Regional Office for Quality Assurance Hesse (GQH) (B.M.), Eschborn, Department of Neurology (G.M.v.R.), Asklepios Klinik Bad Salzhausen, Nidda; Stroke Register North-Rhine (K.O.), Institute for Quality in Health Care North-Rhine (IQN), Duesseldorf; Department of Geriatric Medicine (L.P.), Ruhr University, Herne; Department of Neurology (D.S.), University of Munich; German Stroke Foundation (M.W.), Guetersloh, Germany.

Correspondence to Peter U. Heuschmann, MD, MPH, Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 3, 48149 Münster. E-mail heuschma{at}uni-muenster.de

Background and Purpose— There is no consensus about indicators for measuring quality of acute stroke care in Germany. Therefore, a standardized process was initiated recently to develop and implement evidence-based indicators for the measurement of quality of acute hospital stroke care.

Methods— Quality indicators were developed by a multidisciplinary board between November 2003 and December 2005. The process was initiated by the German Stroke Registers Study Group in cooperation with the German Stroke Society, the German Society of Neurology, the German Stroke Foundation, Regional Offices for Quality Assurance and other experts proven in the field. National and international recommendations were considered during the development process. The process was based on a systematic literature review, an independent external evaluation of the process and its results, and a prospective pilot study to evaluate the defined indicators in clinical practice.

Results— Overall a set of 24 indicators was developed to measure performance of acute care hospitals in the 3 health care dimensions structure, process and outcome as well as in 3 treatment phases prehospital, in-hospital/acute and postacute. Practicability of the derived indicators was tested in a prospective pilot study. During a 2-month period, 1006 patients in 13 hospitals were documented. Application of the new indicator set was found to be feasible by participating physicians and hospitals. Median time to document the required information for 1 patient was 5 minutes. Nationwide implementation of the new indicator set within regional registers in Germany started since April 2006.

Conclusions— The development of indicators to measure hospital performance in stroke care is an important step toward improving stroke care on a national level. The chosen standardized evidence-based approach ensures maximal transparency, acceptance and sustainability of the developed indicators in Germany.


Key Words: acute care • quality indicators • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Abilleira, M. Gallofre, A. Ribera, E. Sanchez, and R. Tresserras
Quality of In-Hospital Stroke Care According to Evidence-Based Performance Measures: Results From the First Audit of Stroke, Catalonia (Spain) 2005/2006
Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1433 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
P. Lindsay RN PhD, M. Bayley MD, A. McDonald BScPT, I. D. Graham PhD, G. Warner PhD, and S. Phillips MBBS
Toward a more effective approach to stroke: Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 20, 2008; 178(11): 1418 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. A. Hinchey, T. Shephard, S. T. Tonn, R. Ruthazer, H. P. Selker, and D. M. Kent
Benchmarks and Determinants of Adherence to Stroke Performance Measures
Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1619 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Lyons and A. G. Rudd
Health Policy and Outcomes 2006
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 229 - 231.
[Full Text] [PDF]